刑事印证证明新探
发布时间：2018-10-04 18:30
【摘要】：刑事印证证明是指在刑事诉讼中利用不同证据内含信息的同一性来证明待证事实,这里的同一性包括信息内容的同一与指向的同一。印证证明既适用于个别证据的判断,也适用于证据的综合判断,还适用于对证据真实性、合法性和相关性的判断;其作用机理一是真理(真实)融贯论,二是真理(真实)符合论,三是归纳逻辑与溯因推理;其考量因素包括参与印证的证据的品质、数量、清晰度,是否存在客观性证据尤其是隐蔽性证据,是否符合经验法则,是否合理嵌入整体的事实构造,以及是否存在合理差异等。实践中对印证证明的误用表现为:违法取证,强求印证;只看印证事实,忽略对案件的"综观式验证";违背证明规律,忽略心证功能。印证模式的改革方向是坚持印证主导,加强心证功能,注重追证作用,发挥验证功效。
[Abstract]:Criminal proof means that the identity of information contained in different evidence is used in criminal proceedings to prove the facts to be proved. The identity here includes the identity of the information content and the identity of the direction. The proof of proof is applicable to the judgment of individual evidence, the comprehensive judgment of evidence, and the judgment of authenticity, legitimacy and relevance of evidence. The second is the theory of truth (truth) conformity, and the third is inductive logic and retroactive reasoning; its consideration factors include the quality, quantity and clarity of the evidence involved in verification, the existence of objective evidence, especially hidden evidence, and whether it conforms to the rule of experience. Whether it is reasonable to embed the fact of the whole structure, and whether there are reasonable differences and so on. In practice, the misuse of proof is: obtaining evidence illegally and demanding proof; only looking at the facts, ignoring the "comprehensive verification" of the case; violating the law of proof, ignoring the function of heart evidence. The reform direction of the verification model is to insist on the leading of verification, strengthen the function of heart syndrome, pay attention to the function of seeking evidence, and give full play to the function of verification.
【作者单位】： 教育部2011计划司法文明协同创新中心;四川大学法学院;
【基金】：四川大学中央高校基本科研业务费研究专项(哲学社会科学项目)——学科前沿与交叉创新重点项目资助
【分类号】：D925.2
本文编号：2251430
[Abstract]:Criminal proof means that the identity of information contained in different evidence is used in criminal proceedings to prove the facts to be proved. The identity here includes the identity of the information content and the identity of the direction. The proof of proof is applicable to the judgment of individual evidence, the comprehensive judgment of evidence, and the judgment of authenticity, legitimacy and relevance of evidence. The second is the theory of truth (truth) conformity, and the third is inductive logic and retroactive reasoning; its consideration factors include the quality, quantity and clarity of the evidence involved in verification, the existence of objective evidence, especially hidden evidence, and whether it conforms to the rule of experience. Whether it is reasonable to embed the fact of the whole structure, and whether there are reasonable differences and so on. In practice, the misuse of proof is: obtaining evidence illegally and demanding proof; only looking at the facts, ignoring the "comprehensive verification" of the case; violating the law of proof, ignoring the function of heart evidence. The reform direction of the verification model is to insist on the leading of verification, strengthen the function of heart syndrome, pay attention to the function of seeking evidence, and give full play to the function of verification.
【作者单位】： 教育部2011计划司法文明协同创新中心;四川大学法学院;
【基金】：四川大学中央高校基本科研业务费研究专项(哲学社会科学项目)——学科前沿与交叉创新重点项目资助
【分类号】：D925.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 韩继亮;;实现司法合理性的修辞学进路[J];北方经贸;2014年06期
，本文编号：2251430
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2251430.html
