刑事诉讼中专家辅助人的诉讼地位研究
发布时间：2018-10-07 17:24
【摘要】：我国于2012年《刑事诉讼法》中首次明确刑事诉讼领域中专家辅助人参与诉讼的规定,这标志着我国刑事诉讼专家辅助人的制度的建立。但随着专家辅助人制度在刑事为诉讼参与人的诉讼地位如何定位直接决定其诉讼权利义务的内容,所以刑事诉讼专家辅助人诉讼地位不明确就会导致其诉讼权利义务内容不明确,最终使其难以在诉讼活动中难以有效的发挥作用。因此专家辅助人在刑事诉讼中究竟应该适合怎样的诉讼地位成了刑事法学界亟待解决的问题。通过实例案件的可以反映出刑事诉讼专家辅助人在我国司法实践中的现实处境,对其目前诉讼地位不适性有直观的判断,再结合理论分析得出刑事诉讼专家辅助人最为合适的职业属性。从而通过这些属性准确定位其在刑事诉讼中应当的诉讼地位,最后在这—诉讼地位的基础上构建出诉讼权利义务的内容。
[Abstract]:In the Criminal procedure Law of our country in 2012, the provisions on the participation of the expert assistant in the field of criminal procedure were made clear for the first time, which marked the establishment of the system of the expert assistant in the criminal procedure in our country. However, with the expert assistant system in criminal proceedings for participants in the status of litigation how to directly determine the content of their litigation rights and obligations, Therefore, the lack of clear litigation status of criminal litigation experts will lead to unclear content of litigation rights and obligations, which makes it difficult to play an effective role in litigation activities. Therefore, what kind of litigation status should be suitable for expert assistant in criminal proceedings has become an urgent problem in criminal law circles. The case can reflect the actual situation of the criminal procedure expert assistant in our country's judicial practice, and has the intuitive judgment to its current lawsuit status unwell, Combined with the theoretical analysis, the most suitable professional attributes of the expert assistant in criminal procedure are obtained. Through these attributes, it can accurately locate its litigation status in criminal proceedings, and finally construct the content of litigation rights and obligations on the basis of this-litigation status.
【学位授予单位】：哈尔滨商业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2
本文编号：2255034
[Abstract]:In the Criminal procedure Law of our country in 2012, the provisions on the participation of the expert assistant in the field of criminal procedure were made clear for the first time, which marked the establishment of the system of the expert assistant in the criminal procedure in our country. However, with the expert assistant system in criminal proceedings for participants in the status of litigation how to directly determine the content of their litigation rights and obligations, Therefore, the lack of clear litigation status of criminal litigation experts will lead to unclear content of litigation rights and obligations, which makes it difficult to play an effective role in litigation activities. Therefore, what kind of litigation status should be suitable for expert assistant in criminal proceedings has become an urgent problem in criminal law circles. The case can reflect the actual situation of the criminal procedure expert assistant in our country's judicial practice, and has the intuitive judgment to its current lawsuit status unwell, Combined with the theoretical analysis, the most suitable professional attributes of the expert assistant in criminal procedure are obtained. Through these attributes, it can accurately locate its litigation status in criminal proceedings, and finally construct the content of litigation rights and obligations on the basis of this-litigation status.
【学位授予单位】：哈尔滨商业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李学军;朱梦妮;;专家辅助人制度研析[J];法学家;2015年01期
2 邹明理;;专家辅助人出庭协助质证实务探讨[J];中国司法鉴定;2014年01期
3 龙宗智;孙末非;;非鉴定专家制度在我国刑事诉讼中的完善[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;2014年01期
4 李想;;英美专家证人制度对我国的借鉴意义[J];赤子(中旬);2013年11期
5 樊崇义;吴光升;;鉴定意见的审查与运用规则[J];中国刑事法杂志;2013年05期
6 尹丽华;;刑事诉讼专家辅助人制度的解读与完善[J];中国司法鉴定;2013年03期
7 刘广三;汪枫;;论我国刑事诉讼专家辅助人制度的完善[J];中国司法鉴定;2013年02期
8 刘鑫;;职业鉴定人制度的困境与对策[J];中国政法大学学报;2012年06期
9 吴常青;王彪;;论我国刑事鉴定意见审查判断权的实现[J];中国司法鉴定;2012年05期
10 栾时春;张明泽;;论我国司法鉴定人对鉴定事项的释明[J];中国司法鉴定;2012年04期
，本文编号：2255034
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2255034.html
