论刑事侦查阶段犯罪嫌疑人的人权保障
[Abstract]:In the process of criminal investigation, the national investigative organs often need to use various measures to find out the facts of the case and to find out the truth of the incident. In the face of the powerful state power, the criminal suspect appears weaker and weaker, and the lack of the guarantee mechanism of the criminal suspect's rights in our country puts it in a more disadvantageous position. In judicial practice, extorting confessions by torture does not stop despite repeated prohibitions, and there are many cases of injustice, falsehood and error, first du Peiwu, then she Xianglin. This bloody lesson has made us gradually realize the importance of protecting the human rights of criminal suspects. Based on the current situation of human rights protection of criminal suspects in China, this paper tries to draw lessons from the valuable experience of human rights protection theory of criminal suspects at home and abroad, on the basis of comparative analysis. Some suggestions are put forward to perfect the human rights guarantee mechanism of criminal suspects in China. This paper is divided into four parts: the first chapter introduces the basic meaning, formation and development of the concept of human rights, and reveals that human rights protection has a long history. The theory of human rights guarantee originates from the victory of the western bourgeoisie revolution, and with the development of society, the content of human rights protection is constantly enriched. Individual rights, collective rights and national rights have become an integral part of contemporary human rights. Then it analyzes the main characteristics of the human rights guarantee of criminal suspects in the criminal investigation stage, and finally expounds the relevant provisions of the international conventions on the human rights protection of criminal suspects, including the right to enjoy humane treatment. The right to prohibit arbitrary and illegal detention; the right to a lawyer; the right to judicial remedies, etc. The second chapter introduces the mode of human rights protection of criminal suspects in Anglo-American law system and civil law system. The basic idea of the civil law system is to discover the entity truth. It emphasizes the unilateral exercise of the power of the investigative organ, despises the rights of the criminal suspect, and even regards the suspect as the object of investigation. Due to the requirement of due process, the Anglo-American legal system attaches importance to the protection of the criminal suspect's rights and regards the suspect as the subject of investigation which is equivalent to the investigative organ. In the analysis and comparison, we summarize some experiences on human rights protection in the two legal systems, and introduce the present situation and shortcomings of human rights protection system in criminal investigation procedure in our country. The aim is to arouse readers' deep thinking on the human rights guarantee system of our country's criminal suspects. The third chapter discusses the theoretical basis and importance of human rights protection of criminal suspects. Because the essence of criminal proceedings is the conflict between government and individual. In the investigation practice, the investigation and control organ often arbitrarily deprives the suspect of his personal liberty and property, which makes the conflict more acute. Therefore, restricting the power of the government and protecting the human rights of criminal suspects is of great significance to the criminal justice reform in our country. The fourth chapter discusses how to perfect and perfect the human rights guarantee system of criminal suspects in criminal investigation procedure according to the actual situation of our country. It mainly includes giving criminal suspects the right to silence; establishing a judicial review system of compulsory investigation power; establishing bail system; strengthening lawyers' right to defense and so on. Through the full text discussion, the article finally points out that with the transformation of China's social structure, the expansion of opening up and the deepening of the legal system reform, we must be able to step out of the single concept of crime control and actively restrict the powerful judicial power. Establish an effective supervision mechanism. To make the human rights protection mechanism of criminal suspects more sound.
【学位授予单位】:中国政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2007
【分类号】:D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李青松;关于对建立我国刑事强制措施司法审查制度的思考[J];安徽电力职工大学学报;2001年02期
2 刘根菊;沉默权与严禁刑讯逼供[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2000年04期
3 赵世义;关于人权理论问题的几点思考[J];法学评论;1997年05期
4 叶青;中英未成年犯罪嫌疑人、被告人适用保释之比较研究[J];青少年犯罪问题;2002年03期
5 蔡杰,肖萍;我国侦查程序引入对抗制之必要性——对我国侦查模式的反思[J];中国人民公安大学学报;2004年01期
6 孙长永;高峰;;刑事侦查中的司法令状制度探析[J];广东社会科学;2006年02期
7 姜焕强,杨清良;我国律师刑事辩护制度研究[J];河北法学;2005年02期
8 成凤明;何春华;;论我国刑事侦查权的司法控制[J];时代法学;2006年06期
9 徐玲利;论刑事司法国际标准与国内标准的冲突与协调[J];检察实践;2004年03期
10 迟松剑;刑事侦查中犯罪嫌疑人人权保障研究[J];北京人民警察学院学报;2005年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前9条
1 张淑玲;非法证据的效力问题研究[D];中国政法大学;2001年
2 刘高;我国犯罪嫌疑人人权保障制度疏略[D];湘潭大学;2003年
3 秦升明;论侦查阶段犯罪嫌疑人获得律师辨护权[D];安徽大学;2004年
4 孙晶;论侦查阶段犯罪嫌疑人的权利保护[D];黑龙江大学;2004年
5 李战亚;公安机关刑事侦查阶段犯罪嫌疑人人权保障问题研究[D];郑州大学;2005年
6 王宏;论侦查阶段对犯罪嫌疑人权利的保障[D];中国政法大学;2006年
7 侯明;侦查权的司法控制探究[D];中国政法大学;2006年
8 杨琳;论刑事侦查程序中犯罪嫌疑人的人权保障[D];郑州大学;2006年
9 关倚琴;论犯罪嫌疑人知悉权[D];西南政法大学;2006年
,本文编号:2260209
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2260209.html