证据裁判主义视阈下的情态证据规范与运用——以我国审判中心主义改革为分析视角

发布时间：2018-10-12 19:59

【摘要】：情态证据指的是在庭审时,被告人或证人的面部、声音或身体等各部分及其整体上表现出来的能够证明案件真实情况的材料。情态证据是对人类本能和心理的一种司法运用,是基于人的情绪发生变化时由植物神经系统作用而引起动作或生理变化的原理。可以通过合理压力刺激被告人或证人等的记忆和心理,激发其情态。司法人员则基于对被告人、证人或案件的了解,结合其他证据材料,判断情态所蕴含信息。情态证据运用的规范性要求明确情态证据的证据种类,收集、提供主体,审查判断和运用程序。情态证据运用的前提条件是,需要强化庭审法官和陪审员的裁判权,限制审判委员会的裁判权,规范庭下阅卷,强调庭审展开唯一性。情态证据运用的中心环节是,质证对象应为原始性证据,质证程序应该完整充分,质证控制应当迅速有力。
[Abstract]:Modal evidence refers to the face, voice or body of the defendant or witness and the material that can prove the truth of the case as a whole. Modal evidence is a kind of judicial application of human instinct and psychology. It is based on the principle of action or physiological change caused by the action of plant nervous system when human emotion changes. It can stimulate the memory and psychology of the defendant or witness through reasonable pressure. Judicial officers based on the defendant, witnesses or cases, combined with other evidentiary materials, to judge the information contained in modality. The normative application of modal evidence requires clarifying the type of evidence, collecting, providing the subject, examining, judging and applying the procedure. The prerequisite for the use of modal evidence is that it is necessary to strengthen the jurisdiction of trial judges and jurors, restrict the jurisdiction of the judicial committee, standardize the examination papers under the court, and emphasize the uniqueness of the trial. The central link of the application of modal evidence is that the object of cross-examination should be original evidence, the cross-examination procedure should be complete and sufficient, and the control of cross-examination should be rapid and effective.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学刑事侦查学院;
【基金】：2015年国家法治与法学理论研究项目“证据分析的认知机制与偏差控制研究”(项目编号:15sfb3017)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】