证明力规则的效力分析——《关于办理死刑案件审查判断证据若干问题的规定》文本的解读
发布时间:2018-10-21 15:27
【摘要】:《关于办理死刑案件审查判断证据若干问题的规定》中存在中国式的证明力规则。然而,与英美法系的证据规则相比,我国的证据证明力规则效力,具有弱规范性、非规范性和非授权性的特点。对于中国证明力规则诸多教科书式的文本表达,规则制定者有必要在"立法"技术上反思:将大量经验性规则作为司法解释条款"法律化",难免有重回法定制度时代之嫌。还应注意,证明力规则的排除条款的刚性弱化,使这一证据规则警示功能降低,有悖于设立初衷。
[Abstract]:There are Chinese rules of proof in examining and judging evidence in death penalty cases. However, compared with the evidence rules of Anglo-American law system, the rule of proof power in our country has the characteristics of weak normative, non-normative and unauthorized. It is necessary for the rule makers to reflect on the "legislation" technology for the text expression of the rules of proof in China: it is hard to avoid the possibility of returning to the era of legal system if a large number of empirical rules are taken as terms of judicial interpretation "legalization". It should also be noted that the rigidity of the exclusion clause of the rule of proof is weakened, which reduces the warning function of the rule of evidence, which is contrary to the original intention of establishment.
【作者单位】: 辽宁大学法学院;辽宁大学文学院;
【基金】:辽宁省教育厅优秀人才资助项目(WJQ2012004) 国家社会科学基金资助项目(09BFX064)
【分类号】:D925.2
[Abstract]:There are Chinese rules of proof in examining and judging evidence in death penalty cases. However, compared with the evidence rules of Anglo-American law system, the rule of proof power in our country has the characteristics of weak normative, non-normative and unauthorized. It is necessary for the rule makers to reflect on the "legislation" technology for the text expression of the rules of proof in China: it is hard to avoid the possibility of returning to the era of legal system if a large number of empirical rules are taken as terms of judicial interpretation "legalization". It should also be noted that the rigidity of the exclusion clause of the rule of proof is weakened, which reduces the warning function of the rule of evidence, which is contrary to the original intention of establishment.
【作者单位】: 辽宁大学法学院;辽宁大学文学院;
【基金】:辽宁省教育厅优秀人才资助项目(WJQ2012004) 国家社会科学基金资助项目(09BFX064)
【分类号】:D925.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 罗书平;;死刑复核程序的现状及法律思考[J];法学家;1995年02期
2 陈华杰;略议死刑案件中处理存疑证据的若干方式[J];法律适用;2005年01期
3 林维;;死刑案件应当如何复核[J];w,
本文编号:2285526
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2285526.html