论涉外民事诉讼协议管辖制度—兼论我国相关立法完善
发布时间:2018-10-23 20:20
【摘要】:随着经济全球化的快速发展,国家间的民事交往愈加频繁,大量的涉外民事纠纷也随之产生。涉外民事管辖权的确定是处理涉外民事纠纷的前提,但由于各国立法对涉外民事管辖权有着不同规定,容易导致涉外民事管辖权冲突的产生。涉外民事诉讼协议管辖作为当事人意思自治在涉外民事诉讼领域的体现,对避免或者消除涉外民事管辖权的积极冲突有着重要意义,并得到大多数国家的接受和采纳。如今涉外民事协议管辖制度已在不同国家的法律和国际条约中得到了发展,涉外民事协议管辖在形式要件、选择法院范围、弱方当事人的保护等方面呈现出许多新的发展趋势,其中不乏关于涉外协议管辖制度的合理先进的立法规定值得我国借鉴。本文主要通过历史分析法及比较分析法对涉外民事诉讼协议管辖制度进行阐述,并试着提出具有创新性的思考和建议,以完善我国《民事诉讼法》中涉外民事协议管辖的相关规定。本文共有三章。第一章是涉外民事诉讼协议管辖的概述。以涉外民事协议管辖的定义为切入点,分析了涉外民事协议管辖的类型及其性质与效力问题,介绍了涉外民事协议管辖的产生及目前的发展趋势,最后探讨了该制度的作用与价值。第二章通过介绍目前具有代表性的国家及国际组织对涉外民事协议管辖的相关立法规定,总结了各国和国际组织在涉外民事诉讼协议管辖制度上的特点、经验及趋势。第三章分析我国涉外民事协议管辖的立法现状及其不足之处,通过借鉴国外关于涉外民事诉讼协议管辖的经验,提出完善我国涉外民事协议管辖制度的一些建议。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economic globalization, civil communication between countries has become more frequent, and a large number of civil disputes involving foreign countries have also emerged. The determination of civil jurisdiction concerning foreign affairs is the premise of dealing with civil disputes involving foreign affairs. However, due to the different provisions on civil jurisdiction concerning foreign affairs in various countries, it is easy to cause conflicts of civil jurisdiction concerning foreign affairs. As the embodiment of party autonomy in the field of foreign civil action, the jurisdiction of civil action agreement concerning foreign affairs is of great significance to avoid or eliminate the positive conflict of civil jurisdiction concerning foreign affairs, and has been accepted and adopted by most countries. Nowadays, the jurisdiction system of civil agreement concerning foreign affairs has been developed in the laws and international treaties of different countries. The jurisdiction of civil agreement concerning foreign affairs has shown many new development trends in the aspects of formal elements, choice of court scope, protection of weak parties, etc. Among them, there are some reasonable and advanced legislative provisions on the jurisdiction system of foreign-related agreements which are worthy of our country's reference. This article mainly through the historical analysis method and the comparative analysis method carries on the elaboration to the foreign civil lawsuit agreement jurisdiction system, and tries to put forward the innovative thought and the suggestion, In order to improve the Civil procedure Law of China foreign civil agreement jurisdiction related provisions. There are three chapters in this paper. The first chapter is a summary of the jurisdiction of foreign civil litigation agreement. Based on the definition of foreign civil agreement jurisdiction, this paper analyzes the types, nature and effectiveness of foreign civil agreement jurisdiction, and introduces the emergence and current development trend of foreign civil agreement jurisdiction. Finally, the function and value of the system are discussed. The second chapter summarizes the characteristics, experiences and trends of the foreign civil agreement jurisdiction system of various countries and international organizations by introducing the relevant legislative provisions of the foreign civil agreement jurisdiction of the representative countries and international organizations at present. The third chapter analyzes the current legislative situation and shortcomings of foreign civil agreement jurisdiction in our country, and puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the jurisdiction system of foreign civil agreement by referring to the experience of foreign countries.
【学位授予单位】:广东外语外贸大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.1
本文编号:2290359
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economic globalization, civil communication between countries has become more frequent, and a large number of civil disputes involving foreign countries have also emerged. The determination of civil jurisdiction concerning foreign affairs is the premise of dealing with civil disputes involving foreign affairs. However, due to the different provisions on civil jurisdiction concerning foreign affairs in various countries, it is easy to cause conflicts of civil jurisdiction concerning foreign affairs. As the embodiment of party autonomy in the field of foreign civil action, the jurisdiction of civil action agreement concerning foreign affairs is of great significance to avoid or eliminate the positive conflict of civil jurisdiction concerning foreign affairs, and has been accepted and adopted by most countries. Nowadays, the jurisdiction system of civil agreement concerning foreign affairs has been developed in the laws and international treaties of different countries. The jurisdiction of civil agreement concerning foreign affairs has shown many new development trends in the aspects of formal elements, choice of court scope, protection of weak parties, etc. Among them, there are some reasonable and advanced legislative provisions on the jurisdiction system of foreign-related agreements which are worthy of our country's reference. This article mainly through the historical analysis method and the comparative analysis method carries on the elaboration to the foreign civil lawsuit agreement jurisdiction system, and tries to put forward the innovative thought and the suggestion, In order to improve the Civil procedure Law of China foreign civil agreement jurisdiction related provisions. There are three chapters in this paper. The first chapter is a summary of the jurisdiction of foreign civil litigation agreement. Based on the definition of foreign civil agreement jurisdiction, this paper analyzes the types, nature and effectiveness of foreign civil agreement jurisdiction, and introduces the emergence and current development trend of foreign civil agreement jurisdiction. Finally, the function and value of the system are discussed. The second chapter summarizes the characteristics, experiences and trends of the foreign civil agreement jurisdiction system of various countries and international organizations by introducing the relevant legislative provisions of the foreign civil agreement jurisdiction of the representative countries and international organizations at present. The third chapter analyzes the current legislative situation and shortcomings of foreign civil agreement jurisdiction in our country, and puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the jurisdiction system of foreign civil agreement by referring to the experience of foreign countries.
【学位授予单位】:广东外语外贸大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 黄忠顺;;应诉管辖原则之制度展开[J];东方法学;2016年06期
2 黄忠顺;;论应诉管辖制度的司法嬗变及其规则构建[J];中国法学;2016年05期
3 蔡俊;;民事诉讼中的应诉管辖制度研究[J];武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版);2016年05期
4 袁发强;瞿佳琪;;论协议管辖中的“实际联系地”——立法目的与效果的失衡[J];国际法研究;2016年05期
5 吴永辉;;论新《民诉法》第34条对涉外协议管辖的法律适用[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2016年05期
6 郭玉军;司文;;国际民事诉讼中应诉管辖标准研究[J];苏州大学学报(法学版);2016年03期
7 张彩云;;我国涉外民事诉讼程序相关问题解析——兼评《解释》涉外民事诉讼程序特别规定[J];潍坊学院学报;2016年04期
8 陈姝文;;两大法系下协议选择法院制度的萌芽与发展[J];法制与社会;2016年23期
9 赵洋;;涉外民商事诉讼协议管辖规则研究——兼评海牙《选择法院协议公约》[J];商;2016年20期
10 宰晓燕;;我国涉外民商事诉讼管辖权制度的完善[J];法制与社会;2016年12期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 梁昭仪;;论管辖协议的效力范围[A];“决策论坛——管理决策模式应用与分析学术研讨会”论文集(下)[C];2016年
,本文编号:2290359
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2290359.html