刑事裁判文书中目的解释的实践运用

发布时间：2018-10-25 12:53

【摘要】：通过对刑事裁判文书中目的解释的实践运用研究,表明刑法理论和司法实践对待目的解释存在明显的差异。主观目的解释与客观目的解释的选择性运用,须根据司法实践的具体情况而定。目的解释不是决定性的解释方法,各种解释方法之间也不存在位阶性。目的解释既可以用来佐证文义解释和体系解释的结论,也可以用来限定文义解释结论的宽泛性。同样的,体系解释也可以用来佐证目的解释的结论。刑事裁判文书中目的解释的运用法则呈现多元化的特征。在建构目的解释的司法运用规则时,不宜以目的解释作为直接根据认定行为的性质,在刑事裁判文书中应叙明规范目的的识别方法,并通过反向论证来检验目的解释的合理性。
[Abstract]:Through the study of the practice and application of the purpose interpretation in the criminal adjudication document, it is shown that there are obvious differences between the criminal law theory and the judicial practice in the interpretation of the purpose. The selective application of subjective purpose interpretation and objective purpose interpretation must be based on the specific situation of judicial practice. Objective interpretation is not a decisive interpretation method, and there is no hierarchy between various interpretation methods. Objective explanation can be used not only to support the conclusion of textual meaning interpretation and system interpretation, but also to limit the broad nature of textual meaning interpretation conclusion. Similarly, the system explanation can be used to support the conclusion of the purpose explanation. The rules of purpose interpretation in criminal adjudication documents are characterized by diversity. In constructing the rules of judicial application of the interpretation of purpose, it is not appropriate to take the interpretation of purpose as the direct basis of the nature of the act, and to state the identification method of the purpose of the norm in the criminal adjudication document, and to test the rationality of the interpretation of the purpose through the reverse argument.
【作者单位】：南昌大学法学院;南昌大学立法研究中心;
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】