论我国民事“送达难”的成因与对策
[Abstract]:The system of civil service is a means of communicating actions and information between the court, the parties and other litigants in civil litigation, and its important significance is obvious. However, due to the lack of specific provisions on the civil service procedure in our country's legislation, there are many provisions which are difficult to be effectively applied in practical operation, which restrict the work of service. In practice, the phenomenon of rough service exists in courts and postal institutions, which easily causes the parties to question the validity of service and restricts the realization of the effectiveness of service. However, under the background of lack of honesty consciousness, dishonest behaviors such as concealment, false report and avoidance of complaint have become a major inducement of "difficult to serve". In practice, the phenomenon of "difficult to serve" becomes more and more prominent, constantly constraining the process of the case, and the problem of "difficult to serve" needs to be alleviated and solved. For this reason, the civil service of our country can be perfected as follows: first, through legislation to refine some of the more chaotic service methods applied in practice, to cancel the provisions of service procedures that do not meet the needs of practice. Selective legal recognition of some of the flexibilities in practice; The second is to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of service by standardizing, disciplining the court, the person served and the postal personnel. Third, by perfecting the system of the place of service, seeking the address of the party as far as possible, and ensuring the actual service to the person served as far as possible. At the same time, the parties cannot be held responsible for the service caused by their own problems, so as to lighten the responsibility of the court. This paper improves the efficiency and success rate of service by perfecting the legislation of civil service and standardizing the behavior of the parties in practice.
【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈杭平;;“粗疏送达”:透视中国民事司法缺陷的一个样本[J];法制与社会发展;2016年06期
2 刘敏;;电子诉讼潮流与我国民事诉讼法的应对[J];当代法学;2016年05期
3 王福华;;电子法院:由内部到外部的构建[J];当代法学;2016年05期
4 侯学宾;;我国电子诉讼的实践发展与立法应对[J];当代法学;2016年05期
5 ;关于民事案件送达问题的调研报告[J];山东审判;2016年04期
6 杨长青;;诉讼文书送达机制的整合和优化[J];人民司法(应用);2016年07期
7 周翠;;德国司法的电子应用方式改革[J];环球法律评论;2016年01期
8 谢瑜;雷舒越;蒋益兵;;以信息化应用创新公安人口管理——关于四川省“一标三实”工作的实践与思考[J];四川警察学院学报;2015年06期
9 龚雪林;;送达地址确认制度中的约束机制——以程序正当性为视角[J];人民司法;2015年21期
10 张瑞强;;信用卡纠纷诉讼的文书送达[J];人民司法;2014年21期
相关重要报纸文章 前4条
1 邹征优;;江西高院电子邮件送达获双赢[N];人民法院报;2013年
2 王庆;;江北 电子送达的实践与困惑[N];人民法院报;2013年
3 林晔晗 ;黄彩华;;东莞第二法院电子送达方式多样化[N];人民法院报;2011年
4 邬勤怡;叶利霞;;我国民事推定送达制度的问题与完善[N];人民法院报;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 李军;民事诉讼送达制度研究[D];华东政法大学;2015年
2 都晓彤;民事诉讼送达瑕疵问题研究[D];西南政法大学;2014年
3 顾玮靓;我国民事送达制度研究[D];复旦大学;2012年
4 王明霞;我国民事诉讼中送达问题的研究[D];苏州大学;2011年
,本文编号:2322669
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2322669.html