“恶意民事诉讼”的识别及其法律规制
[Abstract]:Civil litigation is supposed to be the last line of defense for the parties to use legal weapons to resolve disputes and safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, which embodies the value pursuit of fairness and justice. However, in recent years, with the development of economy and legal system, citizens' legal consciousness has been improved, and the situation of excessive litigation caused by the lack of legal belief has also been increasing. The emergence of malicious litigation has become a pathological phenomenon in the field of litigation. Malicious litigation not only infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of others, causes the waste of litigation resources, but also destroys the judicial order of the country and impacts on the authority of the law. The theory and judicial practice of our country have carried on the thorough research to the malicious lawsuit question, the newly revised "Civil procedure Law" has also added the related laws and regulations of the malicious civil lawsuit, but from the overall view, China has never formed a unified understanding of malicious litigation, nor has it established a complete legal system of malicious litigation. Therefore, from the perspective of malicious litigation in the field of civil litigation, this paper systematically discusses and studies the problem of malicious civil litigation. The text of this paper is divided into five parts: the first part is the definition of malicious civil action. The author analyzes and compares the definition of malicious civil action outside China and the academic circles of our country, and distinguishes it with similar concepts, and then probes into the definition of malicious civil action. The second part is the identification of malicious civil action. Combined with specific cases in judicial practice, this paper summarizes and describes the characteristics, forms and constitutive requirements of all kinds of malicious civil litigation cases, which lays a theoretical foundation for further prevention and regulation of malicious civil litigation. The third part is about the malicious civil action carries on the extraterritorial investigation. The author introduces and summarizes the relevant laws and regulations of Germany, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, the United States and other countries in the civil law system of the continental law system in view of malicious civil litigation. For our country consummates the malicious civil lawsuit legal system to provide the reference. The fourth part is to discuss the present situation of malicious civil action in our country. The author divides this part into three aspects: firstly, analyzing and discussing the causes of malicious civil action, secondly combing the current law of malicious civil action in our country, and describing the actual judicial status quo. Finally, according to the relevant laws and regulations, summed up the existing problems. The fifth part is the legal regulation of malicious civil action. In order to form a complete system of regulation and regulation, the author makes a complete regulation and strike at the three stages of malicious civil action before, during and after the conclusion of the case, and puts forward solutions to the specific problems in each stage, so as to form a complete regulatory system. More closely to malicious civil action to prevent and strike.
【学位授予单位】:南京财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张卫华;论股东恶意诉讼的构成及其责任承担(下)——一起案例引起的思考[J];中国律师;2003年06期
2 章晓洪;论恶意诉讼[J];河北法学;2005年05期
3 李辉;;别滥扣“恶意诉讼”的帽子[J];政府法制;2006年08期
4 董绍君;;浅论恶意诉讼[J];政府法制;2006年10期
5 王江;;警惕恶意诉讼对社会的危害[J];太原理工大学学报(社会科学版);2006年S1期
6 怀宇;;我国恶意诉讼侵权制度的构建[J];法律适用;2009年11期
7 吕培培;;论恶意诉讼的程序法规制[J];商品与质量;2010年S9期
8 徐楠轩;;论知识产权恶意诉讼的侵权责任[J];商场现代化;2010年33期
9 雷业涛;;论恶意诉讼的认定标准[J];湖南警察学院学报;2011年04期
10 王琼;;浅议恶意诉讼[J];法制与经济(中旬);2012年04期
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 苏团;让恶意诉讼人承担责任[N];法制日报;2005年
2 广西公安干部管理学院 黄 龙;论恶意诉讼问题[N];人民法院报;2003年
3 华东政法学院 肖 晋;论恶意诉讼[N];人民法院报;2004年
4 本报通讯员 张伟;从一起案件看—— 恶意诉讼挑战法律空白[N];济南日报;2006年
5 胡建萍;恶意诉讼构成要件分析[N];人民法院报;2006年
6 记者 顺兴 辛明;狙击恶意诉讼[N];西部法制报;2010年
7 本报记者 李莉 本报通讯员 杜豫苏 赵旭忠;规制恶意诉讼 净化司法空间[N];人民法院报;2010年
8 山东省泰安市人民检察院 戴磊 范军 叶丛中;恶意诉讼司法防范三点建议[N];检察日报;2009年
9 高陵县人民法院院长 程振亚 副院长 刘运平;防治恶意诉讼 维护诉讼秩序[N];西部法制报;2010年
10 课题组成员 李爱伟 冯海玲 杜娜娜;惩防并举 遏制恶意诉讼[N];人民法院报;2012年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 于海生;恶意诉讼侵权责任法律制度研究[D];黑龙江大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 怀宇;论恶意诉讼侵权[D];中国政法大学;2009年
2 张莹;民事恶意诉讼规制问题研究[D];吉林大学;2010年
3 安伟娟;恶意诉讼问题研究[D];河北大学;2007年
4 韩正元;恶意诉讼法律规制研究[D];苏州大学;2009年
5 尹琪;论恶意诉讼的法律规制[D];华东政法大学;2010年
6 鲁歌;恶意诉讼及其规制[D];西北大学;2011年
7 刘洋;论恶意诉讼的法律规制[D];河南大学;2011年
8 任华;论恶意诉讼及其法律规制[D];对外经济贸易大学;2007年
9 陈伟;论恶意诉讼及其规制[D];西南政法大学;2011年
10 王杰;恶意诉讼的法律规制[D];南京师范大学;2011年
,本文编号:2349923
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2349923.html