台湾地区对质诘问权与传闻例外的关系考察

发布时间：2018-12-11 05:46

【摘要】：我国台湾地区有关传闻法则例外的规定虽忽视对刑事被告对质诘问权的保障,但实务上以"司法院"将对质诘问权解释为"宪法之基本权利"为基础,先后发展出三种体现对质诘问权优位于传闻例外的解释路径。后续发展中,台湾地区法院刑庭总会将可信性保障作为传闻例外成立的重点考量因素,使得对质诘问权与传闻例外的关系再次陷入扑朔迷离之中。从长远来看,对质诘问权仍然可以依靠实务上独立发展出的容许例外以及严格证明程序的保障,确立其优先于传闻例外的地位。台湾地区对质诘问权与传闻例外关系的发展体现出实务部门在权利保障和真实发现之间的价值抉择,对于祖国大陆刑事被告对质诘问权的确立和保障具有启发意义。
[Abstract]:Although the exception to hearsay law in Taiwan ignores the protection of the right of cross-examination of criminal defendants, the practice is based on the interpretation of the right of cross-examination by the Judicial Yuan as "the fundamental right of the Constitution". It has developed three kinds of interpretation paths which reflect the superiority of cross-examination power in hearsay exception. In the subsequent development, the Taiwan District Court and Criminal Court will regard the credibility guarantee as the key factor for the establishment of the hearsay exception, which makes the relationship between the right of cross-examination and the exception of hearsay to fall into confusion again. In the long run, the right of cross-examination can still be established as priority over hearsay exception by relying on the allowed exceptions developed independently in practice and the guarantee of strict proof procedures. The development of the relationship between cross-examination right and hearsay exception in Taiwan region reflects the value choice between the protection of rights and the real discovery, which is instructive to the establishment and protection of the right of cross-examination of criminal defendants in mainland China.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目“刑事庭审质证规则研究”(16XJA820001) 重庆市法学会研究课题“刑事庭审实质化问题研究”(CFH2016B02)
【分类号】：D927

【参考文献】