行政首次判断权理论及其适用
发布时间：2018-12-11 21:09
【摘要】：行政首次判断权理论是指法院在司法审查的过程中,应尊重行政机关对行政事务作出优先判断及处理的权力;对行政机关职权范围内的事项,法院一般只能在行政机关进行首次判断之后,才能进行审判。该理论源起于日本,其最初被创立的目的在于否定课予义务诉讼和预防性不作为诉讼;后来,该理论趋于"缓和",其主要作用变为限制前述两类诉讼。该理论的正当性依据是权力分立原则、司法国家体制下司法权的特性以及行政权的优势等。我国行政审判法官们已开始运用该理论来裁判案件,但存在不太恰当甚至错误适用该理论的情形。今后,我国应进一步借鉴域外这一理论,从立法上明确课予义务判决中尊重行政机关首次判断权的情形,修正该类判决中否定行政机关首次判断权的路径,并确立预防性不作为诉讼。
[Abstract]:The theory of the right of administrative first judgment means that the court should respect the power of the administrative organ to make the first judgment and deal with the administrative affairs in the process of judicial review. For matters within the jurisdiction of the administrative organ, the court can only try the matter after the first judgment of the administrative organ. The theory originated in Japan and was originally founded to negate compulsory litigation and preventive omission litigation. Later, the theory tended to be "relaxed" and its main role became to restrict the two types of litigation. The legitimacy of the theory is based on the principle of separation of powers, the characteristics of judicial power under the judicial system and the advantages of administrative power. The administrative judges of our country have begun to use this theory to judge cases, but there are some cases where the theory is not properly or even wrongly applied. In the future, our country should draw lessons from the theory of extra-territorial, make clear in legislation the situation of respecting the first judgment right of the administrative organ in the compulsory judgment, and amend the way of denying the first judgment right of the administrative organ in this kind of judgment. And establish preventive omission litigation.
【作者单位】： 中南大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目“司法与行政互动的法律规制研究”(15BFX013)的阶段性成果 法治湖南建设与区域社会治理协同创新中心平台建设的成果
【分类号】：D925.3
本文编号：2373225
[Abstract]:The theory of the right of administrative first judgment means that the court should respect the power of the administrative organ to make the first judgment and deal with the administrative affairs in the process of judicial review. For matters within the jurisdiction of the administrative organ, the court can only try the matter after the first judgment of the administrative organ. The theory originated in Japan and was originally founded to negate compulsory litigation and preventive omission litigation. Later, the theory tended to be "relaxed" and its main role became to restrict the two types of litigation. The legitimacy of the theory is based on the principle of separation of powers, the characteristics of judicial power under the judicial system and the advantages of administrative power. The administrative judges of our country have begun to use this theory to judge cases, but there are some cases where the theory is not properly or even wrongly applied. In the future, our country should draw lessons from the theory of extra-territorial, make clear in legislation the situation of respecting the first judgment right of the administrative organ in the compulsory judgment, and amend the way of denying the first judgment right of the administrative organ in this kind of judgment. And establish preventive omission litigation.
【作者单位】： 中南大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目“司法与行政互动的法律规制研究”(15BFX013)的阶段性成果 法治湖南建设与区域社会治理协同创新中心平台建设的成果
【分类号】：D925.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 杨知文;;司法能动主义与当下中国的能动司法——语境和语义的考察与比较分析[J];哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报;2010年01期
2 唐学亮;;司法能动主义基本问题研究[J];四川警察学院学报;2012年01期
3 胡瑞琪;侯卓;;行政诉讼事实审查的中国问题——基于比较法的视角[J];湖北社会科学;2014年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 胡亚虎;论我国逮捕羁押制度的重构[D];安徽大学;2014年
，本文编号：2373225
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2373225.html
