论网络司法拍卖辅助工作机构的定位及管理

发布时间：2018-12-14 20:41

【摘要】：司法拍卖辅助工作机构是执行权社会化运行的产物,承担了本应由法院直接行使的部分司法拍卖权。法院与拍卖辅助工作机构之间是公权力委托关系,法院委托拍卖辅助工作机构从事拍卖辅助工作的协议是公法契约。拍卖辅助工作机构根据法院的委托行使执行权,其行为产生的后果由法院承担。基于分担执行工作量与防止司法腐败的现实考量,法院将拍卖辅助工作委托给社会机构来完成,其背后的法理依据是民事执行的社会参与和执行效益原则。应当将法院委托社会机构承担拍卖辅助工作与委托拍卖区分开来,明确各参与主体的行为责任。同时,应坚持"严格准入条件""规范选定程序""重视过程监管""强化事后惩罚"等原则,不断健全和完善拍卖辅助工作机构的选定和监管制度。
[Abstract]:The auxiliary working organization of judicial auction is the product of socialized operation of executive power, which bears part of the judicial auction right which should be exercised directly by the court. There is a public power entrustment relationship between the court and the auction auxiliary working organization, and the agreement that the court entrusts the auction auxiliary working organization to engage in the auction auxiliary work is a public law contract. The auxiliary auction agency shall exercise the executive power according to the commission of the court, and the consequences of the act shall be borne by the court. Based on the realistic consideration of sharing the execution workload and preventing judicial corruption, the court entrusts the auxiliary work of auction to the social organization to complete, and the legal basis behind it is the principle of social participation and execution benefit of civil execution. It is necessary to distinguish the court entrusting social institutions with the ancillary work of auction and entrusting auction to clarify the responsibility of each participating subject. At the same time, we should adhere to the principles of "strict access conditions", "normalize the selection procedure", "attach importance to process supervision" and "strengthen punishment after the event", and constantly improve and perfect the selection and supervision system of the auxiliary working institutions of auction.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;重庆市高级人民法院执行局;重庆市第二中级人民法院执行局;
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】