行政诉讼集中管辖制度研究

发布时间：2018-12-26 10:37

【摘要】：对行政诉讼集中管辖制度是多年来全国各级法院行政案件革新工作的重点,也是取得实践效果及经验最为丰硕的部分。早在2000年,在最高院的主导下部分地区即开始了集中管辖制度试点工作。2007年浙江省丽水市中级人民法院展开的“相对集中指定管辖制度”的试行工作受到了广泛关注,其对反馈效果和相关数据进行了系统的评估与分析,在广大学者之间引起了较大反响。在此之后,在最高人民法院的推动下,集中管辖在多地得以推广试行,取得了较为全面的反馈结果。而在2014年《行政诉讼法》修改之后,各级法院得以放开手脚,普遍开始在各自辖区内开展行政诉讼集中管辖制度改革工作。本文以深圳市2015年6月开始推行的集中管辖制度改革工作为参照范例,搜集相关数据进行系统分析,以探究集中管辖制度在实践中体现的优势以及存在的问题。通过数据可以直观的发现,集中管辖制度确能发挥阻却行政不当干预、提升审判效率及专业性、合理配置司法资源以及同一裁判尺度,提升司法公信力等价值。但同时也存在对当事人合法权益保障力度不足、配套制度不完善、改革不彻底等问题。通过对上述问题的深入分析,发现通过调整相应措施、降低诉讼成本、构建沟通机制等方式能够实现对集中管辖制度的合理完善,这也是本文研究的重点所在。值得注意的是,集中管辖制度是一个过渡性的制度,其最终指向应当为设立行政专门法院。因此笔者对行政专门法院设立的可行性进一步加以探讨,并针对层级设置、审判职能结构等方面进行了初步的研究,以期对我国行政诉讼审判体系的未来发展进行一些有所裨益的思考。
[Abstract]:The system of centralized jurisdiction over administrative litigation is the focal point of the reform of administrative cases in courts at all levels in China for many years, and it is also the most fruitful part of achieving practical results and experience. As early as 2000, the pilot work of the centralized jurisdiction system began in some areas under the leadership of the Supreme Court. In 2007, the trial work of "relatively centralized designated jurisdiction system" carried out by the Lishui Intermediate people's Court in Zhejiang Province received widespread attention. The feedback effect and related data are systematically evaluated and analyzed, which has caused a great response among scholars. After this, under the promotion of the Supreme people's Court, centralized jurisdiction has been popularized and tried in many places, and more comprehensive feedback results have been obtained. After the revision of the Administrative Litigation Law in 2014, courts at all levels were able to open their hands and hands, and generally began to reform the system of centralized jurisdiction of administrative proceedings in their respective jurisdictions. Taking the reform of the centralized jurisdiction system in Shenzhen in June 2015 as a reference example, this paper collects relevant data for systematic analysis in order to explore the advantages and existing problems of the centralized jurisdiction system in practice. Through the data we can find that centralized jurisdiction system can play the value of hindering the improper intervention of administration, improving the efficiency and professionalism of the trial, allocating the judicial resources and the same judgment standard, enhancing the credibility of the judicature and so on. But at the same time, there are also some problems, such as insufficient protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, imperfect supporting system, incomplete reform and so on. Through the in-depth analysis of the above problems, it is found that by adjusting the corresponding measures, reducing litigation costs, building communication mechanism and other ways can achieve the rational improvement of centralized jurisdiction system, which is also the focus of this study. It is worth noting that the centralized jurisdiction system is a transitional system, and its ultimate direction should be the establishment of special administrative courts. Therefore, the author further discusses the feasibility of the establishment of special administrative courts, and makes a preliminary study on the establishment of hierarchy and the structure of judicial functions. With a view to the future development of our country's administrative litigation trial system for some beneficial thinking.
【学位授予单位】：深圳大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.3

【参考文献】