论我国刑事诉讼中的不可靠证据排除规则

发布时间：2019-04-09 21:11

【摘要】：最高人民法院在其司法解释中确立了大量为提高事实认定的准确性而排除证据的规则。不可靠证据排除规则的产生,回应了我国司法实践的迫切需要,有利于解决法官认定案件事实难的问题。在我国当前的司法环境下,确立一定数量的不可靠证据排除规则对于规范法官审查判断证据的活动,防范冤假错案的发生,具有积极意义。但鉴于我国不可靠证据排除规则的局限性,在具体法律规范的制定上,尚需严格限制绝对排除规则的适用范围,确立法官违反规则的法律救济;明确"补正"与"合理解释"的标准,强化相对排除规则的规范效力;完善实物证据的鉴真规则,明确控方对证据真实性的举证义务。
[Abstract]:In its judicial interpretation, the Supreme people's Court has established a large number of rules to exclude evidence in order to improve the accuracy of fact determination. The emergence of the rule of exclusion of unreliable evidence responds to the urgent need of judicial practice in our country and is conducive to solving the problem of the judge's difficulty in determining the facts of the case. In the current judicial environment of our country, it is of positive significance to establish a certain number of exclusion rules of unreliable evidence for standardizing the judge's activity of examining and judging evidence and preventing the occurrence of wrongs and wrongs. However, in view of the limitation of the rule of exclusion of unreliable evidence in our country, it is still necessary to strictly limit the scope of application of the rule of absolute exclusion and to establish the legal remedies for the violation of the rules by judges in the formulation of specific legal norms. We should make clear the standard of "correction" and "reasonable explanation", strengthen the normative effect of the relative exclusion rule, perfect the identification rule of physical evidence, and clarify the burden of proof by the prosecution on the authenticity of evidence.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学法学院;
【基金】：2017年西南政法大学资助项目(2017XZQN-20) 四川省社科重点基地纠纷解决与司法改革研究中心资助课题(2015DJKT17)的研究成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】