刑事和解制度的司法检视与完善进路

发布时间：2019-04-29 06:26

【摘要】：刑事和解制度自2013年《刑事诉讼法》立法确认后施行至今,制度实施的社会功能整体较好,不仅有利于弥补被害人的合法权益,也有利于加害人重新回归社会。审视这一制度在司法中的运行现状,其仍存在适用条件较粗疏、法律效果规定过于模糊、赔偿标准不规范及履约方式单一、缺乏审查加害人是否真诚悔过的相关配套措施等缺陷。对此,应首先完善制度的适用条件,明确"三年(或七年)以下有期徒刑"的含义,将加害人与被害人原先的社会关系纳入"自愿性"的考察标准。其次,明确制度的法律效果,明晰"从宽"在不同诉讼阶段中的涵义并统一规定和解协议书的法律效力视同于附带民事调解书。复次,促进赔偿标准的规范化及加害人履行义务方式的多元化。此外,还应制定考察当事人真诚、自愿和解的持续性措施。
[Abstract]:Since the implementation of the criminal reconciliation system in 2013, the social function of the system has been better, which is not only beneficial to make up for the legitimate rights and interests of the victims, but also conducive to the return of the harms to society. Looking at the status quo of this system in judicial operation, it still exists that the applicable conditions are relatively coarse, the provisions of legal effects are too vague, the standard of compensation is not standardized and the mode of performance is single. Lack of inspection of the perpetrator whether sincere repentance of the relevant supporting measures and other shortcomings. Therefore, we should first perfect the applicable conditions of the system, make clear the meaning of "fixed-term imprisonment of less than three years (or less)", and bring the original social relationship between the victimizer and the victim into the inspection standard of "voluntary nature". Secondly, it makes clear the legal effect of the system, clarifies the meaning of "leniency" in different stages of litigation, and provides that the legal effect of the settlement agreement is the same as that of the attached civil conciliation statement. Again, to promote the standardization of compensation standards and the diversification of the parties to fulfill their obligations. In addition, it should also be formulated to investigate the parties sincere, voluntary settlement of the continuing measures.
【作者单位】：重庆人文科技学院政治与法律学院;重庆市合川区人民法院;
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】