商谈视阈下当事人陈述制度研究

发布时间：2019-06-03 21:17

【摘要】：当事人陈述因其证明意义上的重要性,被我国《民事诉讼法》作为法定证据形式引入法律文本之中,但作为一种法定证据形式,当事人陈述在实践中并未得到充分的肯定和运用。直至2015年《民事诉讼法司法解释》的施行,增加了当事人在陈述时,应当遵循诚实信用原则进行宣誓和签署保证书的程序性要求,其规定虽在一定程度上弥补了当事人陈述在程序上设置的不足,但并未真正解决其在具体内涵、证明价值、证据地位等相关制度因素设置上的空白。本文突破仅将当事人陈述作为证据形式予以司法运用的传统、单一的视角,试图在沟通主义法范式的指引下,将西方哈贝马斯的商谈理论与我国诉讼法部门中的当事人陈述相结合,从而将传统的诉讼视为一种事实与规范言语整合的过程。其中,当事人陈述作为诉讼行为的基本形态,是诉讼中最重要的言语活动。全文除前言外,共分四个部分对当事人陈述制度予以探讨。第一部分是对当事人陈述制度的概述。通过对当事人陈述概念的界定,更好的理解当事人陈述的性质、特点以及其所具有的功能。第二部分是对当事人陈述存在的问题及其原因的分析。通过对当事人陈述在立法与司法实践中存在问题及原因的分析,为下文完善当事人陈述制度的理论基础提供前提。第三部分试图通过哈贝马斯的商谈理论、民事诉讼沟通理论完善当事人陈述制度的理论基础。其中,对哈贝马斯商谈理论、民事诉讼沟通理论的阐述,为我国当事人陈述商谈理论体系提供了深厚的理论根基。第四部分是对当事人陈述制度完善具体路径的设计。在真实性、正当性、真诚性原则的指导下,宏观把握当事人陈述的发展方向,通过区分询问与听取当事人制度、确立询问当事人程序规则、完善听取当事人陈述制度、完善当事人陈述约束机制以及完善当事人陈述相关配套制度等对当事人陈述制度予以具体设计,从而实现程序上的合法化与合理化的诉讼模式,进而推进当代中国法治范式理论与实践的深入发展与研究。
[Abstract]:Because of the importance of the party's statement in the sense of proof, the Civil procedure Law of our country has been introduced into the legal text as the form of legal evidence, but as a form of legal evidence, The party statement has not been fully affirmed and used in practice. Until the implementation of the Judicial interpretation of the Civil procedure Law in 2015, the procedural requirements for the parties to take the oath and sign the guarantee in accordance with the principle of good faith in their statements have been increased. Although its stipulation makes up for the deficiency of the party statement in the procedure to a certain extent, it does not really solve the blank in the setting of the specific connotation, proof value, evidence status and other related institutional factors. This paper breaks through the tradition of judicial application of the party's statement as the form of evidence, and tries to be guided by the pattern of communication law from a single perspective. Combining the negotiation theory of western Habermas with the statements of the parties in the procedural law department of our country, the traditional litigation is regarded as a process of the integration of facts and normative speech. Among them, as the basic form of litigation behavior, party statement is the most important speech activity in litigation. In addition to the preface, the full text is divided into four parts to discuss the party statement system. The first part is an overview of the party statement system. Through the definition of the concept of party statement, we can better understand the nature, characteristics and functions of the party statement. The second part is the analysis of the problems existing in the statement of the parties and their causes. Through the analysis of the problems and causes of the party statement in legislation and judicial practice, this paper provides the premise for perfecting the theoretical basis of the party statement system below. The third part tries to perfect the theoretical basis of the party statement system through Habermas' negotiation theory and civil litigation communication theory. Among them, the Habermas negotiation theory and the civil litigation communication theory provide a profound theoretical foundation for the party to state the negotiation theory system in our country. The fourth part is the design of the specific path to improve the party statement system. Under the guidance of the principles of authenticity, legitimacy and sincerity, we should grasp the development direction of the parties' statements, distinguish the system of asking and listening to the parties, establish the procedural rules of the parties to inquire, and perfect the system of listening to the statements of the parties. Perfecting the restriction mechanism of the party statement and perfecting the related supporting system of the party statement to design the party statement system concretely, so as to realize the procedural legalization and rationalization of the litigation mode. And then promote the in-depth development and research of the theory and practice of the paradigm of the rule of law in contemporary China.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】