论纪检监察证据在刑事诉讼中的属性

发布时间：2019-06-08 13:26

【摘要】：纪检监察证据是指纪检机关在查处违纪案件过程中所获得的能够证明案件真实情况的材料。实务界和法学界对纪检材料的证据资格和证明力问题主要存在肯定说、否定说和折中说三种基本观点。纪检材料中客观性证据的合法性问题已经获得法律的明确认可。纪检材料中的主观性证据,往往需要由检察机关重新搜集,并存在例外。言词材料在法理、法律和实践上都存在模糊空间。纪检材料证据资格分析的前提性问题包括纪检程序的正当性问题、法律界限及其例外、纪检材料的证明作用辨别。言词材料的证据资格和证明作用应重新构建,具体包括纪检机关和检察机关主体互认、程序衔接和证据种类衔接。同时,应进一步建立健全线索交流机制、案卷移送机制和人权保障机制。
[Abstract]:Discipline inspection and supervision evidence refers to the materials obtained by discipline inspection organs in the process of investigating and dealing with disciplinary violations, which can prove the true situation of the case. There are three basic viewpoints on the evidence qualification and proof power of discipline inspection materials in practical and legal circles: negation theory and compromise theory. The legality of objective evidence in discipline inspection materials has been clearly recognized by law. Subjective evidence in discipline inspection materials often needs to be re-collected by procuratorial organs, with exceptions. There is a fuzzy space in law, law and practice of speech materials. The predicate problems of evidence qualification analysis of discipline inspection materials include the legitimacy of discipline inspection procedure, the legal boundary and its exceptions, and the identification of the proof function of discipline inspection materials. The evidence qualification and proof function of speech materials should be rebuilt, including mutual recognition between discipline inspection organs and procuratorial organs, procedural cohesion and evidence types convergence. At the same time, we should further establish and improve the clue exchange mechanism, file transfer mechanism and human rights protection mechanism.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学诉讼法学研究院;
【分类号】：D915

【参考文献】