公益诉讼制度的力量组合

发布时间：2019-06-12 01:17

【摘要】：本文以在社会建设领域深受认可的辅助原则作为理论基点,分析了公益诉讼制度力量组合中的位序安排。本文认为,基于新民事诉讼法将公共利益定位于社会公共利益的界定,公共利益的维护应形成一个社会驱动、政府保障的动力机制。目前,应处在第一位序的公益诉讼启动者公民与社会组织,事实上是整体"缺位"的;从理论上分析,行政机关应为第二位序的公益诉讼启动者。单行法在规定行政机关公益诉讼时,需要特别关注行政机关基本职责、在政府权力架构中的地位与民事诉讼机理之间的协调;检察机关是启动公益诉讼的第三位序主体。其合理性依据在于国家机关之间职权运作的次序性。检察机关能否真正成为公益诉讼的第三位序启动主体,需要进一步论证检察机关的功能与职责,检察机关提起的公益诉讼与既有民事诉讼制度的协调等问题。
[Abstract]:Based on the recognized auxiliary principle in the field of social construction, this paper analyzes the arrangement of position in the combination of public interest litigation system. This paper holds that based on the definition of public interest in the new civil procedure law, the maintenance of public interest should form a dynamic mechanism driven by society and guaranteed by the government. At present, citizens and social organizations, which should be in the first order of public interest litigation, are in fact "absent" as a whole. Theoretically, the administrative organ should be the initiator of public interest litigation in the second order. When the separate law stipulates the public interest litigation of the administrative organ, it is necessary to pay special attention to the basic duties of the administrative organ, the coordination between the position in the framework of government power and the mechanism of civil litigation, and the procuratorial organ is the third order subject to initiate public interest litigation. Its rationality is based on the order of the operation of functions and powers between state organs. Whether the procuratorial organ can really become the third order starting subject of public interest litigation needs to further demonstrate the function and responsibility of the procuratorial organ, the coordination between the public interest litigation initiated by the procuratorial organ and the existing civil litigation system, and so on.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学民商经济法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“当代民事诉讼思潮研究”(11YJC820032)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】