制度环境、诉讼策略与民事上诉率变迁——理论模型与初步检验
发布时间:2019-06-18 09:00
【摘要】:上诉是现代民事程序的基础性制度之一,民事上诉率则是测度上诉程序运行效果和司法服务质量(既包括初审法院的也包括上诉法院的)的重要指标。站在中国司法政策变迁和政法制度大背景下,可建构两个既相互独立又相互影响的上诉率变迁模型,即以初审判决质量为基础的"向后看"模型和以预期上诉收益为考量因素的"向前看"模型,再辅以诉讼当事人和上诉审法官之间的动态博弈以及我国独有的组织、审判管理视角,提炼出关于上诉率变迁的两个理论假设。数据检验的初步结论是,我们应重新审视第一审程序的诉权保障功能以及进一步构建上诉甄别和筛选机制。
[Abstract]:Appeal is one of the basic systems of modern civil procedure, and the civil appeal rate is an important index to measure the operation effect of appeal procedure and the quality of judicial service (including both the court of first instance and the court of appeal). Under the background of the change of judicial policy and the system of politics and law in China, we can construct two models of appeal rate change, that is, the "backward view" model based on the quality of the first instance judgment and the "forward looking" model based on the expected appeal income, supplemented by the dynamic game between the litigants and the appellant trial judge, as well as the unique organizational and trial management perspective of our country. Two theoretical assumptions about the change of appeal rate are extracted. The preliminary conclusion of the data test is that we should re-examine the function of safeguarding the right of action in the first instance procedure and further construct the mechanism of appeal screening and screening.
【作者单位】: 南京大学法学院;
【分类号】:D925.1
本文编号:2501350
[Abstract]:Appeal is one of the basic systems of modern civil procedure, and the civil appeal rate is an important index to measure the operation effect of appeal procedure and the quality of judicial service (including both the court of first instance and the court of appeal). Under the background of the change of judicial policy and the system of politics and law in China, we can construct two models of appeal rate change, that is, the "backward view" model based on the quality of the first instance judgment and the "forward looking" model based on the expected appeal income, supplemented by the dynamic game between the litigants and the appellant trial judge, as well as the unique organizational and trial management perspective of our country. Two theoretical assumptions about the change of appeal rate are extracted. The preliminary conclusion of the data test is that we should re-examine the function of safeguarding the right of action in the first instance procedure and further construct the mechanism of appeal screening and screening.
【作者单位】: 南京大学法学院;
【分类号】:D925.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 陈晨;;揭开上诉率的面纱——以刑事案件为对象的SPSS实证分析[J];刑事法评论;2012年01期
2 赵保法;;莘县法院三项措施创新审判流程管理[J];山东人大工作;2011年03期
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 特约记者 李凡敬 通讯员 苗金龙;磴口法院 调判结合降低上诉率[N];巴彦淖尔日报(汉);2010年
2 通讯员 朱岩琴 朱立龙;亭湖量刑规范化降低上诉率[N];江苏法制报;2011年
3 记者 吴晓锋 通讯员 吴春萍 胡娜;海南规范量刑案上诉率5%[N];法制日报;2011年
4 记者 陈忠仪 通讯员 潘巳申;上诉率申诉率均下降[N];人民法院报;2006年
5 袁祖云;肥西民事案上诉率仅一成[N];人民法院报;2009年
6 吴红卫 许卫琴;如何抑制民商案件上诉率上升势头[N];江苏经济报;2006年
7 记者 刘德华 通讯员 蒋琴琴;四川:简易程序案件上诉率明显下降[N];检察日报;2010年
8 记者 李光明;上诉率二审改判率等普遍下降[N];法制日报;2010年
9 尹洪茂;临朐法院以科学发展观统筹审判[N];人民法院报;2004年
10 记者 李宁 通讯员 黄燕 胡淋伟;量刑规范化试点成效明显[N];湖南日报;2010年
,本文编号:2501350
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2501350.html