从立法到司法:刑事诉讼中电子证据之认证

发布时间：2019-08-03 11:40

【摘要】：随着信息技术的不断发展,手机短信、网络聊天记录、网络IP地址等电子数据信息在刑事诉讼中作为证据使用的情形越来越普遍,自从2012年3月《刑事诉讼法》(修正案)把"电子数据"列为法定的证据种类之后,如何对电子证据进行认证的问题已是摆在刑事法官面前的一道难题。通过对刑事裁判文书的统计分析,不难发现:在刑事诉讼中刑事法官认证过程简单化,普遍存在"转化型证据"的问题;在认证方式方面不够重视,对"两步认证"的运用不够普遍。解决电子证据认证问题应在立法上完善证据规则,确立电子证据鉴证规则;在司法实践中应当确立"两步三分法"来完成电子证据的认证过程,也即通过采纳和采信两个步骤来对电子证据的合法性、关联性和真实性进行认证,从而完成电子证据认证的过程。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of information technology, electronic data information, such as mobile phone short message, online chat record, network IP address and so on, is more and more commonly used as evidence in criminal proceedings. Since the Criminal procedure Law (Amendment) listed "electronic data" as a legal type of evidence in March 2012, how to authenticate electronic evidence has become a difficult problem in front of criminal judges. Through the statistical analysis of the criminal adjudication documents, it is not difficult to find that the process of criminal judge certification is simple in criminal proceedings, and there is a common problem of "transformed evidence", the authentication method is not paid enough attention to, and the application of "two-step authentication" is not common enough. In order to solve the problem of electronic evidence authentication, we should perfect the evidence rules and establish the electronic evidence verification rules in legislation; in judicial practice, we should establish the "two-step and three-point method" to complete the authentication process of electronic evidence, that is, to authenticate the legitimacy, relevance and authenticity of electronic evidence through the adoption and acceptance of electronic evidence, so as to complete the process of electronic evidence authentication.
【作者单位】：齐齐哈尔大学哲法学院;天津市第一中级人民法院;
【分类号】：D925.23

【参考文献】