中国区际刑事法律冲突问题研究
发布时间:2018-03-01 12:34
本文关键词: 法域 区际刑事法律 冲突 刑事管辖权 出处:《山东大学》2011年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:中国区际刑事法律是指中国主权范围内四法域(即中国内地、香港、澳门、台湾),为协调解决四法域不同刑事法律及法域治权竞合冲突,而提出的所有法律规范、法律原则以及法律融通机制的总称。中国区际刑法冲突研究不仅关系到法律层面的司法主权和法制体系等问题也关系到政治层面的民族认同感和国家统一问题。中国一系列复杂、特殊的国情衍生的具有挑战性、发展中的新的区际法律问题亟待从理论上分析和研究并力图去的突破,以期在实践中应社会实际所需创新出一套适应中国以“一国两制”为特点的特殊国家结构形式的法律体系来。本文首先对区际刑法冲突进行概述,并就美国和德国的解决模式评析,在分析国外解决模式结合中国自身特点的前提下,重点理析中国区际刑事法律的内容并提出相应解决途径,在理析内容的基础上探讨原则性解决模式并在中国区际刑事管辖权体划分上提出以地域原则为主,国家利益最高利益原则为前提,刑法目原则为前置以及充分考虑司法效益具体划分原则。本文在解决途径的论述中,主要是从宪法性文件的完善和具体的法律机构的健全加以阐述。本文分为四部分阐述中国区际刑法律冲突问题: 第一部分是区际刑事法冲突概述。这一部分首先介绍了区际刑法及区际刑法冲突的概念,同时亦对中国相关的概念进行界定,最后介绍了区际刑事法律冲突的产生原因。 第二部分是国外的解决模式,这一部分分别介绍了美国和德国区际刑事法律冲突问题的解决途径,并对两国解决模式进行比较意义上的理析。 第三部分是中国区际刑法的内容与特征。这一部分首先介绍了中国区际刑法冲突产生原因,其次对中国区际刑法的内容进行探讨并侧重静念冲突分析研究以及区际管辖权概念、分类、特征的理析,最后介绍了中国区际刑法的特征。 第四部分是中国区际刑法的基本原则和解决途径。这一部分主要是中国区际刑法冲突的解决模式的探讨和完善,首先讨论了原则性解决,其次探讨中国区际刑事法律冲突具体解决机制。
[Abstract]:The inter-regional criminal law of China refers to all the legal norms proposed by the four jurisdictions within the scope of China's sovereignty (that is, the mainland of China, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, etc.) in order to coordinate the settlement of conflicts between different criminal laws and jurisdiction in the four jurisdictions, The research on the conflict of criminal law between regions in China is not only related to the judicial sovereignty and legal system in the legal level, but also to the national identity and national unity at the political level. China has a series of complexities, The special national conditions derived from the challenging, developing new interregional legal problems need to be theoretically analyzed and studied and strive to break through, In order to innovate a set of legal system which adapts to China's special state structure with the characteristic of "one country, two systems" in practice, this paper first summarizes the conflict of interregional criminal law. On the basis of the analysis of the solutions of the United States and Germany, and on the premise of analyzing the foreign solutions combined with China's own characteristics, this paper focuses on the analysis of the content of China's inter-regional criminal law and puts forward the corresponding solutions. On the basis of the analysis of the content, the paper discusses the mode of principled solution and puts forward that the principle of region is the main factor and the principle of the highest interests of the state is the premise of the division of the criminal jurisdiction body between regions in China. The principle of criminal law is the principle of preemption and the principle of giving full consideration to the specific division of judicial benefits. This article is divided into four parts to expound the legal conflict of interregional punishment in China. The first part is an overview of the conflict of interregional criminal law. This part first introduces the concepts of interregional criminal law and interregional criminal law conflict, at the same time, defines the relevant concepts in China, and finally introduces the causes of interregional criminal law conflict. The second part is the solution mode of foreign countries. This part introduces the solutions to the conflict of criminal law between the United States and Germany, and makes a comparative analysis of the two countries' solutions. The third part is the content and characteristics of China's interregional criminal law. Secondly, it discusses the content of China's interregional criminal law and focuses on the analysis of the conflict between static and mental states, as well as the concept, classification and characteristics of interregional jurisdiction. Finally, it introduces the characteristics of China's inter-regional criminal law. Part 4th is the basic principle and solution of China's interregional criminal law. This part is mainly about the exploration and improvement of the solution mode of the conflict of Chinese interregional criminal law. Secondly, it discusses the specific settlement mechanism of the interregional conflict of criminal law in China.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D921;D924
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵相林,刘英红;美国州际法律冲突与我国区际法律冲突之比较[J];比较法研究;2000年01期
2 高铭暄,王秀梅;我国区际刑事管辖冲突的内涵及解决原则[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1999年06期
3 倪德锋;论中国区际刑事管辖权的冲突与解决[J];福建政法管理干部学院学报;2000年01期
4 赵秉志;田宏杰;;中国内地与香港刑事管辖权冲突研究──由张子强案件引发的思考[J];法学家;1999年06期
5 柯良栋;;论中国区际移交逃犯应遵循的原则及其模式[J];法学家;2008年04期
6 杜焕芳;中国区际法律问题研究的最新进展——评《中国的区际法律问题研究》[J];法学评论;2004年05期
7 马进保;;我国内地与港澳的区际司法协助与机制构建[J];河北法学;2008年03期
8 郭玉军;徐锦堂;;中国区际法律冲突解决路径探析(上)[J];时代法学;2008年01期
9 时延安;;中国区际刑法概念及基本体系[J];南都学坛;2006年02期
10 姜雯;;《反分裂国家法》初探[J];理论界;2006年07期
,本文编号:1551959
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xianfalw/1551959.html