当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 宪法论文 >

我国刑事被告人对质权研究

发布时间:2018-03-22 02:37

  本文选题:权利 切入点:对质权 出处:《甘肃政法学院》2011年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:权利保护是现代社会热门话题,我国自改革开放以来,法治建设中的一条主线就是加强对公民权利的保障。从权利保护角度来分析刑事证据制度,直接关系到权利保护的范围、方式、限度以及权利保护中的冲突等问题,而这些问题又影响着刑事程序和证据制度的具体设计,具有直接针对性。 对质权制度作为被告人权利保护的一个重要方面,在国外的发展已经日趋成熟和完善,很多国家将其上升到宪法权利的高度。笔者想通过了解对质权制度的发展进程和价值以及其存在的意义,借鉴我国已有的一些研究成果,进一步深入研究,勾画出专属于或者专适用于刑事被告人的对质权制度,从而对刑事诉讼改革起到推动性的作用,进一步完善对质权制度与相关证据制度的链接。 本文通过对对质权制度的概述和这一制度相关知识的梳理与综述,在初步掌握其内涵与外延的基础上分析了其存在的价值与意义,着重分析了对质权制度在国外的发展状况,以英美法系和大陆法系为基础来进行比较法考察,论证此权利作为被告人的一项基本人权存在的正当根据,结合我国关于质证的具体规定和立法司法现状,将其与我国司法实践中的相关证据制度联系起来进行比较分析,从被告人对质权的基本内容出发,意图找到适合我国国情的刑事被告人对质权制度,从而提出对完善我国对质权制度的构想。 本文的主要观点有四:第一,对质权作为刑事被告人权利保护领域一个基本的人权,它的存在是必要的并具有现实意义;第二,我国职权主义审判模式未能彻底改观,导致案卷中心主义依然占庭审的主导地位,并因此导致了对刑事被告人对质权的忽视;第三,我国有关证据制度立法的不完备和司法部门对被告人基本权利的忽视导致了现行制度在实践中被扭曲;第四,建立适合我国司法实践的对质权制度,给予被告人基本权利的保护,是完善当前司法制度的方法之一。
[Abstract]:The protection of rights is a hot topic in modern society. Since the reform and opening up, one of the main lines in the construction of rule of law is to strengthen the protection of civil rights. The analysis of the criminal evidence system from the angle of the protection of rights directly relates to the scope of the protection of rights. Methods, limits and conflicts in the protection of rights, which affect the specific design of criminal procedure and evidence system, have direct pertinence. As an important aspect of the protection of defendant's rights, the system of pledge right has been matured and perfected in foreign countries. Many countries raise it to the height of constitutional right. The author wants to learn the development process and value of pledge right system and the significance of its existence, draw lessons from some existing research results in our country, and further study. This paper outlines the system of pledge right which belongs to or applies to the criminal defendant, thus promoting the reform of the criminal procedure and further perfecting the link between the pledge right system and the relevant evidence system. Based on the summary of the pledge system and the relevant knowledge of the system, this paper analyzes the value and significance of its existence on the basis of grasping its connotation and extension, and emphatically analyzes the development of the pledge system in foreign countries. Based on the comparative law of Anglo-American law system and civil law system, this article demonstrates that this right is the legitimate basis for the existence of the defendant's basic human rights, and combines the specific provisions on cross-examination and the current situation of legislation and judicature in our country. By comparing it with the relevant evidence system in our country's judicial practice, starting from the basic content of the defendant's right to pledge, the author intends to find out the system of the criminal defendant's right to pledge, which is suitable for the situation of our country. Thus, the author puts forward the idea of perfecting the system of pledge right in our country. The main viewpoints of this paper are as follows: first, the existence of pledge right, as a basic human right in the field of protecting the rights of criminal defendants, is necessary and has practical significance; second, the trial mode of power doctrine in our country has not been completely changed. As a result, file centrism still dominates the trial, which leads to the neglect of the pledge right of the criminal defendant; third, The incomplete legislation of evidence system in our country and the neglect of the basic rights of the accused by the judicial department lead to the distortion of the current system in practice. Fourth, the establishment of the system of pledge right suitable for the judicial practice in our country. The protection of the basic rights of the accused is one of the ways to perfect the current judicial system.
【学位授予单位】:甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D925.2;D921

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 吴畅;;论刑事庭审对质[J];重庆科技学院学报;2006年04期

2 陈永生;论辩护方当庭质证的权利[J];法商研究;2005年05期

3 龙宗智;;论刑事对质制度及其改革完善[J];法学;2008年05期

4 霍建平;刘利珍;;论刑事被告人的质证权[J];广播电视大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年03期

5 林林;;刑事被追诉人之质证权探究[J];晋阳学刊;2006年03期

6 陈瑞华;;案卷笔录中心主义——对中国刑事审判方式的重新考察[J];法学研究;2006年04期

7 霍建平;;浅析刑事被告人质证权的确立及其宪法化[J];内蒙古财经学院学报(综合版);2008年05期

8 屈新;;刑事被告人质证权的程序保障[J];中国政法大学学报;2009年01期

9 熊秋红;;刑事证人作证制度之反思——以对质权为中心的分析[J];中国政法大学学报;2009年05期

10 朱道华;;我国刑事质证制度的缺失及立法完善[J];山西省政法管理干部学院学报;2006年01期



本文编号:1646721

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xianfalw/1646721.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户5b0d6***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com