《日本宪法》第9条修改的国际法解读——以国家的对世义务为视角

发布时间：2018-03-30 14:51

本文选题：对世义务　切入点：《日本宪法》第条　出处：《法商研究》2014年06期

【摘要】：国家主权的相对化必然导致国家在国际法上的对世义务,而禁止侵略战争便是这种对世义务的一种现实体现。以第二次世界大战为特定的历史背景,以相关的国际法律文件为基础,《日本宪法》第9条成为日本因违背禁止侵略战争的对世义务而对其应承担的国际责任进行立法转化的结果。《日本宪法》第9条的效力渊源及其有效解释,有助于认识日本应承担的非军事化义务及对其修改的一系列修宪行为的非法性。日本间接或直接修改《日本宪法》第9条,对外将违背以亚洲安全为基础的客观国际体制,对内则将摧毁《日本宪法》的基本架构。日本的修宪行为必将损害曾受日本侵略之苦的亚洲各国的利益,作为日本侵略战争的最大受害者,中国应推动相关国家在相互依赖中构建多层次的替代性安全保障机制。
[Abstract]:The relativization of national sovereignty inevitably leads to the obligation of States to the world under international law, and the prohibition of war of aggression is a realistic embodiment of this obligation to the world, taking the second World War as a specific historical background, On the basis of relevant international legal documents, Article 9 of the Constitution of Japan becomes the result of the legislative transformation of Japan's international responsibility for violating its obligations to the world to prohibit war of aggression. The source of validity and its effective interpretation, Contributing to the understanding of the illegality of Japan's demilitarization obligations and of a series of constitutional amendments to it... Japan's indirect or direct amendment of Article 9 of the Constitution of Japan would run counter to the objective international system based on Asian security, On the other hand, it will destroy the basic framework of the Japanese Constitution. Japan's amendment of the Constitution will certainly harm the interests of the Asian countries that have suffered from the Japanese aggression, and will be the greatest victim of Japan's war of aggression. China should promote the establishment of multi-level alternative security mechanisms in interdependence.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学法学院;
【分类号】：D931.3;DD911;D99

【参考文献】