受教育权属性阐释
发布时间:2018-04-02 19:23
本文选题:受教育权 切入点:自由权 出处:《社会科学家》2013年09期
【摘要】:作为公民基本权利的受教育权作为一种权利形态进入宪法视线是在近代资产阶级革命时期,它与近代社会经济、政治、文化、教育发展息息相关,是人类历史进步的结果。公民受教育权是自由权和社会权的属性兼而有之。作为自由权的受教育权,要求国家不得制定侵犯公民自由权利的法律和要求国家不得非法干预教育自由,尊重教育发展规律。受教育权主要是以社会权的形态表现出来,作为社会权的受教育权,其实现需要国家积极的作为,为教育的实施准备充分的外部条件,同时也要进行干预及控制。干预和控制的正当性在于受教育权这一基本权利不仅仅只是对国家的总体目标具有工具性价值,其内在的和根本的价值在于促进公民个体的自我提升和自我实现。还应从基本权利的性质中体会国家干预和控制的正当性。
[Abstract]:The right to education as the basic rights of citizens as a form of rights into constitution is in the sight of modern bourgeois revolution, it and modern social economy, politics, culture, education is closely related to the development of human history, is the result of the progress. Citizens' right to education is a property of both freedom and social right. The right to education as a free right, state shall make national laws and requirements of infringement of civil liberties may illegally interfere with freedom of education, respect for the law of the development of education. The right to education is mainly displayed in the form of a social right, the right to education as a social right, in fact we need as a positive state, fully prepared for external conditions for education the implementation must also intervene and control. The legitimacy of the intervention and control of the basic rights of the right to education is not only the overall of national standard with The intrinsic and fundamental value of instrumental value lies in promoting the self promotion and self actualization of citizens. We should also understand the legitimacy of state intervention and control from the nature of basic rights.
【作者单位】: 东北林业大学文法学院;
【分类号】:D922.16;D921
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 刘永峰;;公民受教育权的基本理论研究[J];山西省政法管理干部学院学报;2006年03期
2 张步峰;;兼具社会权与自由权性质的受教育权[J];北京行政学院学报;2009年05期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 高全喜;;宪法与革命及中国宪制问题[J];北大法律评论;2010年02期
2 刘练军;;基本法的功能性与开放性及其启示——《联邦德国宪法纲要》读后[J];北方法学;2010年02期
3 湛中乐;谢珂s,
本文编号:1701766
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xianfalw/1701766.html