欧美宪法社会学比较透视

发布时间：2018-05-03 10:06

本文选题：宪法社会学 + 学术传统　；参考：《比较法研究》2014年02期

【摘要】：宪法社会学是关于宪法的社会学研究,是宪法学与社会学交叉融合的产物,旨在发现人类政治生活中的真实规则。在欧洲和北美,宪法社会学已经形成了多元化的学术传统。其中,德国的宪法社会学侧重于从政治与历史的角度切入,偏好史论结合,思辨色彩浓厚。法国的宪法社会学具有客观的、旁观者的叙事风格。英国的宪法社会学打上了判例法或不成文宪法的痕迹,致力于素描一部活生生的宪法,仿佛人类学家的调查报告。美国虽然承袭了英国的判例法制度,但美国的宪法社会学透出强烈的现实主义意味,宪法背后的经济关系、利益格局得到了凸显。梳理欧美宪法社会学的学术传统,比较欧美各国宪法社会学的不同旨趣,有助于为当代中国宪法社会学的稳步发展提供理论与方法论上的启示。
[Abstract]:Constitutional sociology is a sociological study of constitution, which is the product of the combination of constitutional jurisprudence and sociology, aiming at discovering the true rules in human political life. In Europe and North America, constitutional sociology has formed a pluralistic academic tradition. Among them, Germany's constitutional sociology focuses on the political and historical perspective, preference for the combination of historical theory, strong speculative color. French constitutional sociology has an objective and onlooker narrative style. British constitutional sociology marks the trail of case law or unwritten constitution, working on sketching a living constitution, like an anthropologist's investigation. Although the United States inherited the British case law system, but the American constitutional sociology revealed a strong sense of realism, the economic relationship behind the constitution, the pattern of interests has been highlighted. Combing the academic tradition of constitutional sociology in Europe and the United States, and comparing the different purport of constitutional sociology in Europe and the United States, will help to provide theoretical and methodological enlightenment for the steady development of constitutional sociology in contemporary China.
【作者单位】：首都经济贸易大学法学院;
【分类号】：D911

【参考文献】