论合乎中国宪法的行政强制执行模式

发布时间：2018-09-12 10:31

【摘要】：中国行政强制执行模式之争由来已久,至今仍莫衷一是。新近颁行的《行政强制法》基本沿用了原有模式,即以法院强制执行为主,以行政机关自行强制执行为辅。该模式与现行宪法权力体制相背离,依此建立的强制执行法律制度在实施中亦遇到了不少困境和问题。实践表明,由法院作为行政强制执行的主体力量已经不适应中国行政强制执行的现实需要,必须建立新的行政强制执行模式。借鉴大陆法系国家的经验做法,根据宪法原则精神,结合中国行政与司法实际,采用以行政机关执行为原则、以人民法院执行为例外的行政强制执行模式是最佳选择。对于法院执行的例外情形应当进行严格限制,同时还应对行政强制执行权的分配标准和法律责任等作出明确规定。
[Abstract]:There is a long-standing dispute over the mode of administrative enforcement in China, and there is still no agreement on it. The newly enacted Administrative compulsory Law basically follows the original mode, that is to say, the enforcement by the courts is the main one, and the enforcement by the administrative organs is supplementary. The model deviates from the current constitutional power system, and the enforcement legal system established on the basis of this model has encountered many difficulties and problems. Practice shows that the court as the main force of administrative enforcement has not been able to meet the practical needs of China's administrative enforcement, it is necessary to establish a new mode of administrative enforcement. It is the best choice to use the experience and practice of civil law countries for reference, according to the spirit of constitutional principles, combining with the reality of Chinese administration and judicature, to adopt the mode of administrative enforcement with the principle of administrative organ execution and the exception of people's court execution. The exceptional circumstances of court execution should be strictly restricted, and the allocation standard and legal liability of administrative enforcement power should be clearly stipulated at the same time.
【作者单位】：湖北大学政法与公共管理学院;
【分类号】：D921

【参考文献】