学术自由的宪法保护
发布时间:2018-09-12 10:12
【摘要】:学术自由既是高等教育有待深入研究的重要理论问题,也是现代大学发展所面临的实践问题,作为现代大学的重要内涵和大学发展的重要条件,越来越多的学者开始关注对学术自由的研究及其保护问题,尤其是法律保护问题。本文第一部分从对学术自由的内涵入手,主要探讨了学术自由的定义、学术自由的价值、学术自由的限度等内容帮助读者理清有关学术自由的基本概念;第二部分介绍了学术自由的历史演变以及学术自由在我国的发展和现状等内容,以期对学术自由在国内外的发展做一脉络梳理;第三部分探讨了学术自由的权利属性,主要分析了作为一种宪法权利的学术自由权与一般意义上的学术自由之间的异同,介绍了学术自由权的主体范围及权利内容,进一步探讨了学术自由与大学自治之间的关系,学术自由与宪政之间的关系;第四部分梳理了各国学术自由宪法保护的历史发展与现状以及我国宪法对学术自由保护的相关规定;第五部分探讨了学术自由的侵权与救济,包括对学术自由的侵权认定以及学术自由的救济途径等,主要目的在于将实践中常会出现的对学术自由的侵权方式及救济途径展现给读者,并在此基础上对以宪法为中心加强对学术自由的保障提出合理化的建议。本研究结合我国高校目前的实际情况,力图反映出我国目前高校在理论和实践上对学术自由的认识和保障存在的问题,尝试从宪法的高度,通过完善立法、加强司法、减少行政干预、推动大学内部治理结构改革等方式构建完备的学术自由保护体系,以期为保护学术自由,促进我国学术自由的发展提供有益参考。
[Abstract]:Academic freedom is not only an important theoretical problem to be deeply studied in higher education, but also a practical problem facing the development of modern universities. As an important connotation of modern universities and an important condition for their development, More and more scholars begin to pay attention to the research and protection of academic freedom, especially the legal protection. The first part of this paper starts with the connotation of academic freedom, mainly discusses the definition of academic freedom, the value of academic freedom, the limits of academic freedom and so on, which helps readers to clarify the basic concepts of academic freedom. The second part introduces the historical evolution of academic freedom, the development and status quo of academic freedom in China, in order to sort out the development of academic freedom at home and abroad, the third part discusses the right attribute of academic freedom. This paper analyzes the similarities and differences between academic freedom as a constitutional right and academic freedom in general, introduces the subject scope and content of academic freedom, and further discusses the relationship between academic freedom and university autonomy. The fourth part combs the history development and the present situation of the constitutional protection of academic freedom and the relevant provisions of the constitution of our country to the protection of the academic freedom; the fifth part discusses the infringement and relief of the academic freedom. The main purpose of this paper is to show the readers the infringing ways and remedies of academic freedom, which are often found in practice, including the recognition of the infringement of academic freedom and the remedy of academic freedom. On the basis of this, some reasonable suggestions are put forward to strengthen the guarantee of academic freedom with the constitution as the center. This research combines the actual situation of our country's colleges and universities at present, tries to reflect the existing problems of the understanding and guarantee of academic freedom in the theory and practice of our country's colleges and universities at present, tries to strengthen the judicature from the constitutional height, through consummates the legislation, strengthens the judicature. In order to protect academic freedom and promote the development of academic freedom in China, the administrative intervention should be reduced and the reform of university internal governance structure should be promoted.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D921
本文编号:2238691
[Abstract]:Academic freedom is not only an important theoretical problem to be deeply studied in higher education, but also a practical problem facing the development of modern universities. As an important connotation of modern universities and an important condition for their development, More and more scholars begin to pay attention to the research and protection of academic freedom, especially the legal protection. The first part of this paper starts with the connotation of academic freedom, mainly discusses the definition of academic freedom, the value of academic freedom, the limits of academic freedom and so on, which helps readers to clarify the basic concepts of academic freedom. The second part introduces the historical evolution of academic freedom, the development and status quo of academic freedom in China, in order to sort out the development of academic freedom at home and abroad, the third part discusses the right attribute of academic freedom. This paper analyzes the similarities and differences between academic freedom as a constitutional right and academic freedom in general, introduces the subject scope and content of academic freedom, and further discusses the relationship between academic freedom and university autonomy. The fourth part combs the history development and the present situation of the constitutional protection of academic freedom and the relevant provisions of the constitution of our country to the protection of the academic freedom; the fifth part discusses the infringement and relief of the academic freedom. The main purpose of this paper is to show the readers the infringing ways and remedies of academic freedom, which are often found in practice, including the recognition of the infringement of academic freedom and the remedy of academic freedom. On the basis of this, some reasonable suggestions are put forward to strengthen the guarantee of academic freedom with the constitution as the center. This research combines the actual situation of our country's colleges and universities at present, tries to reflect the existing problems of the understanding and guarantee of academic freedom in the theory and practice of our country's colleges and universities at present, tries to strengthen the judicature from the constitutional height, through consummates the legislation, strengthens the judicature. In order to protect academic freedom and promote the development of academic freedom in China, the administrative intervention should be reduced and the reform of university internal governance structure should be promoted.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D921
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 李子江;美国大学学术自由的特色[J];比较教育研究;2005年06期
2 爱德华·希尔斯,林杰;论学术自由[J];北京大学教育评论;2005年01期
3 马凤岐;大学自治与学术自由[J];高教探索;2004年04期
4 陈列;关于西方学术自由的历史演进[J];世界历史;1994年06期
5 胡甲刚;;法治视野下的学术自由权利属性探讨[J];清华大学教育研究;2011年02期
6 谢海定;学术自由:侵权与救济[J];现代法学;2005年06期
7 谢海定;;作为法律权利的学术自由权[J];中国法学;2005年06期
,本文编号:2238691
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xianfalw/2238691.html