“梁氏宪草”对西方宪法理论的引进与改造
发布时间：2018-12-11 10:40
【摘要】：宪法作为国家的根本大法,不仅应当是审慎制定的良善之法,更不可朝令夕改。1913年,梁启超以《进步党拟中华民国宪法草案》作为进步党参与立宪的政治主张。缘何梁氏在宪法草案中放弃君主立宪制而采纳民主共和制,由对美国联邦制之偏好转向了单一制国家结构,不采用责任内阁制而提倡总统制?这当中体现了立宪中各派政治角力相互妥协、国家权力相互制衡的过程。也启发了当今开展法治建设不可仅移植国外法律,吸收国外法治思想,更为必要的是须建立起超越政治与党派权力的宪法权威,实现对宪法理念的本土化改造。
[Abstract]:As the fundamental law of the country, the constitution should not only be a prudent law of good and good, but also cannot be changed day by day. In 1913, Liang Qichao took the "draft Constitution of the Republic of China" as the political proposition of the Progressive Party to participate in the constitution. Why did Liang give up the constitutional monarchy and adopt the democratic republic in the draft constitution?. Instead of adopting the responsible cabinet system, he advocated the presidential system instead of the unitary state structure. This reflects the constitutionalism of political struggle to compromise, state power checks and balances process. It also inspires us to carry out the construction of rule of law not only to transplant foreign laws, but also to absorb the thought of rule of law in foreign countries. What is more necessary is to establish the constitutional authority beyond the power of politics and party, and to realize the localization transformation of the concept of constitution.
【作者单位】： 中山大学法学院;
【分类号】：D921
本文编号：2372394
[Abstract]:As the fundamental law of the country, the constitution should not only be a prudent law of good and good, but also cannot be changed day by day. In 1913, Liang Qichao took the "draft Constitution of the Republic of China" as the political proposition of the Progressive Party to participate in the constitution. Why did Liang give up the constitutional monarchy and adopt the democratic republic in the draft constitution?. Instead of adopting the responsible cabinet system, he advocated the presidential system instead of the unitary state structure. This reflects the constitutionalism of political struggle to compromise, state power checks and balances process. It also inspires us to carry out the construction of rule of law not only to transplant foreign laws, but also to absorb the thought of rule of law in foreign countries. What is more necessary is to establish the constitutional authority beyond the power of politics and party, and to realize the localization transformation of the concept of constitution.
【作者单位】： 中山大学法学院;
【分类号】：D921
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 李秀清;“梁启超宪草”与民国初期宪政模式的选择[J];现代法学;2001年06期
2 胡绳武;梁启超与民初政治[J];近代史研究;1991年06期
3 李育民;进步党述论[J];近代史研究;1986年02期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王军;;“梁氏宪草”对西方宪法理论的引进与改造[J];广州大学学报(社会科学版);2016年10期
2 喻中;;见之于行事:梁启超宪法思想的液态属性[J];政法论丛;2015年02期
3 丁晓宇;;论梁启超的政党伦理思想[J];东南传播;2014年08期
4 俞祖华;;从帝国到民国嬗替之际国家观念的变迁[J];烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年01期
5 丁洁琳;;梁启超与中国近代宪政[J];中国政法大学学报;2013年01期
6 马建标;;袁世凯与民初“党争”[J];近代史研究;2012年03期
7 章永乐;;共和的诤友:康有为《拟中华民国宪法草案》评注[J];中外法学;2010年02期
8 陈忠纯;;论民初进步党的立党理论及分裂的思想根源[J];厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年02期
9 别琳;;20世纪80年代以来“民初政党政治史”研究述评[J];西南大学学报(人文社会科学版);2006年02期
10 张永;国会解散与进步党的分裂瓦解[J];安徽史学;2005年06期
，本文编号：2372394
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xianfalw/2372394.html
