我国行政刑法的立法发展
发布时间:2019-02-19 12:23
【摘要】:行政刑法规范作为既违反行政法又违反刑法而形成的一种兼具行政法与刑法双重属性的特殊法律规范。行政刑法的概念产生于德国,自20世纪80年代末传入我国后,长久以来无论是外国学者还是本国学者都将研究方向放在行政刑法的性质界定、行政犯与刑事犯的区别上,并且在这个问题上争论不休,无法统一。但在这个行政刑法规范范围不断扩大的年代,行政刑法在没有独立立法的情况下,,导致存在法律条文繁多、法律规范混乱的情况。面对这种情况,不应该再过多强调行政刑法的性质归属、行政犯与刑事犯的区别,而应将研究视角放到立法层面,由理论回归到实践,解决司法实践中实际存在的操作困境上来。我国没有德国等欧洲大陆法系国家的法治历史,也没有日本法律文化传统的基础,我国的法制史呈现出的是重刑轻民的法律文化和意识传统,我国行政刑法规范与传统刑法混合在一部刑法典中,走的是一条具有中国特色的行政刑法之路。这是法律文化传统的选择,也是我国法治现状的选择。本文将通过文献研究法和比较研究法,运用刑法学、行政法学、行政刑法学的相关理论,从行政刑法的理论研究入手,比照外国的立法模式,分析行政刑法在我国的立法发展,并进一步探讨我国行政刑法未来重构的方向。
[Abstract]:The administrative criminal law norm is a special legal norm which has the dual attribute of administrative law and criminal law, which not only violates the administrative law but also violates the criminal law. The concept of administrative criminal law came into being in Germany. Since it was introduced to China in the late 1980s, both foreign and domestic scholars have long focused on the definition of the nature of administrative criminal law and the difference between administrative and criminal. And on this issue of debate, can not be unified. However, in this era of expanding the scope of administrative criminal law, administrative criminal law in the absence of independent legislation, leading to the existence of a wide range of legal provisions, legal norms confusion. In the face of this situation, we should not emphasize too much the nature of administrative criminal law, the difference between administrative crime and criminal, but should put the research perspective on the legislative level, from theory to practice. To solve the practical operational dilemma in judicial practice. China does not have the legal history of Germany and other European civil law countries, nor does it have the foundation of the Japanese legal cultural tradition. The legal system history of our country presents a legal culture and a tradition of consciousness that punishes the people more than the people. The standard of administrative criminal law and the traditional criminal law are mixed in one criminal code, which is a road of administrative criminal law with Chinese characteristics. This is the choice of the legal culture tradition, also is our country rule of law present situation choice. This paper will analyze the legislative development of administrative criminal law in our country through literature research and comparative research, using the relevant theories of criminal law and administrative criminal law, starting with the theoretical research of administrative criminal law, comparing with the legislative model of foreign countries. And further explore the direction of the future reconstruction of our administrative criminal law.
【学位授予单位】:中南民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D921;D924
本文编号:2426498
[Abstract]:The administrative criminal law norm is a special legal norm which has the dual attribute of administrative law and criminal law, which not only violates the administrative law but also violates the criminal law. The concept of administrative criminal law came into being in Germany. Since it was introduced to China in the late 1980s, both foreign and domestic scholars have long focused on the definition of the nature of administrative criminal law and the difference between administrative and criminal. And on this issue of debate, can not be unified. However, in this era of expanding the scope of administrative criminal law, administrative criminal law in the absence of independent legislation, leading to the existence of a wide range of legal provisions, legal norms confusion. In the face of this situation, we should not emphasize too much the nature of administrative criminal law, the difference between administrative crime and criminal, but should put the research perspective on the legislative level, from theory to practice. To solve the practical operational dilemma in judicial practice. China does not have the legal history of Germany and other European civil law countries, nor does it have the foundation of the Japanese legal cultural tradition. The legal system history of our country presents a legal culture and a tradition of consciousness that punishes the people more than the people. The standard of administrative criminal law and the traditional criminal law are mixed in one criminal code, which is a road of administrative criminal law with Chinese characteristics. This is the choice of the legal culture tradition, also is our country rule of law present situation choice. This paper will analyze the legislative development of administrative criminal law in our country through literature research and comparative research, using the relevant theories of criminal law and administrative criminal law, starting with the theoretical research of administrative criminal law, comparing with the legislative model of foreign countries. And further explore the direction of the future reconstruction of our administrative criminal law.
【学位授予单位】:中南民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D921;D924
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赤艳;;关于改革与完善劳动教养制度的立法构想[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年S1期
2 李慧英;行政犯罪研究[J];山东工商学院学报;2003年05期
3 简敏;行政处罚中“一事不再罚”原则的适用与例外[J];重庆大学学报(社会科学版);2002年04期
4 关保英;一事不再罚理论的再认识——试从哲学层面上分析[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2002年01期
5 周佑勇,刘艳红;行政刑法性质的科学定位(上)——从行政法与刑法的双重视野考察[J];法学评论;2002年02期
6 周佑勇,刘艳红;行政刑法性质的科学定位(下)——从行政法与刑法的双重视野考察[J];法学评论;2002年04期
7 赵秉志;郑延谱;;中国行政刑法的立法缺憾与改进[J];河北法学;2006年08期
8 陈慧君;再论“一事不再罚”原则[J];安徽警官职业学院学报;2003年02期
9 郭润生,刘东生;行政刑罚基本问题初探[J];山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1998年03期
10 何乃忠;;试论一事不再罚原则[J];现代法学;1993年01期
本文编号:2426498
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xianfalw/2426498.html