香港高度自治权的限度研究
发布时间：2019-06-19 20:31
【摘要】：香港高度自治权源于中央的授权,其行使应当依照香港基本法的规定,不得超过应有的限度。这是高度自治权应有之义。但是在实践中,高度自治权限度存在争议的事例仍然存在。这在客观上是由于基本法不可能包罗万象,存在规定含糊的地方;在主观上是由于没看清高度自治权的本质,对于“一国两制”基本方针没全面把握,致使对高度自治权的界限不明晰,引发高度自治权行使的争议。中央享有对香港特区的完全主权,主权事务应当由中央管治。在这个前提之下,如何充分发挥高度自治权的自主性与积极性是个重要的命题。规范高度自治权在应有限度内行使,需要遵循“一国两制”的精神和基本法的目的,完善基本法规范,促进基本法适用,从高度自治权的内部进行规范,发挥社会监督的力量,让高度自治权从内容、程序和监督上都能有较好的规范。在合理限度内行使高度自治权才能真正保障国家的主权统一和领土完整,保持香港的繁荣和稳定。
[Abstract]:The high degree of autonomy of Hong Kong originates from the authorization of the Central people's Government, and its exercise shall not exceed the due limit in accordance with the provisions of the basic Law of Hong Kong. This is the meaning of a high degree of autonomy. However, in practice, there are still controversial cases of high degree of autonomy. This is objectively due to the fact that the basic Law cannot be all-inclusive and there are vague provisions; subjectively, it is due to the lack of a clear understanding of the nature of a high degree of autonomy and the lack of a comprehensive grasp of the basic principle of "one country, two systems", resulting in unclear boundaries for a high degree of autonomy, which leads to disputes over the exercise of a high degree of autonomy. The Central people's Government has full sovereignty over the Hong Kong Special Administrative region, and sovereign affairs should be governed by the Central people's Government. Under this premise, how to give full play to the autonomy and enthusiasm of a high degree of autonomy is an important proposition. It is necessary to follow the spirit of "one country, two systems" and the purpose of the basic Law, improve the norms of the basic Law, promote the application of the basic Law, standardize from within the high degree of autonomy, give full play to the power of social supervision, and enable a high degree of autonomy to have better norms in terms of content, procedures, and supervision. Only by exercising a high degree of autonomy within a reasonable limit can we truly safeguard the sovereign unity and territorial integrity of the country and maintain the prosperity and stability of Hong Kong.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D921.9
本文编号：2502618
[Abstract]:The high degree of autonomy of Hong Kong originates from the authorization of the Central people's Government, and its exercise shall not exceed the due limit in accordance with the provisions of the basic Law of Hong Kong. This is the meaning of a high degree of autonomy. However, in practice, there are still controversial cases of high degree of autonomy. This is objectively due to the fact that the basic Law cannot be all-inclusive and there are vague provisions; subjectively, it is due to the lack of a clear understanding of the nature of a high degree of autonomy and the lack of a comprehensive grasp of the basic principle of "one country, two systems", resulting in unclear boundaries for a high degree of autonomy, which leads to disputes over the exercise of a high degree of autonomy. The Central people's Government has full sovereignty over the Hong Kong Special Administrative region, and sovereign affairs should be governed by the Central people's Government. Under this premise, how to give full play to the autonomy and enthusiasm of a high degree of autonomy is an important proposition. It is necessary to follow the spirit of "one country, two systems" and the purpose of the basic Law, improve the norms of the basic Law, promote the application of the basic Law, standardize from within the high degree of autonomy, give full play to the power of social supervision, and enable a high degree of autonomy to have better norms in terms of content, procedures, and supervision. Only by exercising a high degree of autonomy within a reasonable limit can we truly safeguard the sovereign unity and territorial integrity of the country and maintain the prosperity and stability of Hong Kong.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D921.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 萧蔚云;论一国两制下中央与香港特别行政区的法律关系[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1991年04期
2 郭天武;陈雪珍;;论中央授权与香港特别行政区高度自治[J];当代港澳研究;2010年02期
3 王磊;;论人大释法与香港司法释法的关系——纪念香港基本法实施十周年[J];法学家;2007年03期
4 程洁;;中央管治权与特区高度自治——以基本法规定的授权关系为框架[J];法学;2007年08期
5 田瑶;;从“吴嘉玲案”看香港法院“违宪审查权”及其限度[J];比较法研究;2012年06期
6 吴天昊;;特别行政区高度自治权:是权力而非权利[J];法学;2012年12期
7 刘诚;许书咏;;中央保留原则下的《香港基本法》第23条立法[J];当代港澳研究;2013年01期
8 秦前红;张筱倜;;基于“菲佣居港权”案件判决的几点反思[J];理论月刊;2014年08期
9 强世功;;司法主权之争——从吴嘉玲案看“人大释法”的宪政意涵[J];清华法学;2009年05期
10 饶戈平;一国两制中的若干法律问题[J];中外法学;1997年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 潘俊强;论香港特别行政区高度自治权的法理基础[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2011年
，本文编号：2502618
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xianfalw/2502618.html
