我国行政征收司法审查强度若干问题研究

发布时间：2019-07-03 14:25

【摘要】：行政征收是国家权力的一种表现形式，它是国家为了公共利益的需要，无须经财产所有人同意而取得公民私人财产或对其进行限制的具体行政行为。司法审查是司法机关对行政机关作出的行政行为进行合法性和合理性审查，并作出相应裁决的法律制度，是推进依法行政、维护社会公平正义的重要手段。本文以司法审查对行政征收权的控制为基础，借鉴两大法系关于司法审查强度的理论和实践，，从对法律问题、事实问题和行政裁量等方面的司法审查入手，对我国行政征收司法审查强度的现状进行分析讨论，并对我国应采取的行政征收司法审查强度提出建议。本文共分三章。第一章为概述。首先，明确了本文所研究的行政征收的定义，即“行政主体依据法律规定，以社会公共利益为目的，以强制方式取得公民、法人或其他组织的财产所有权或对所有权进行限制，并给予公平补偿的具体行政行为”。随后，以比较分析两大法系的司法审查强度理论为基础，对司法审查强度的涵义、涉及的主要方面和标准进行详细论述。第二章主要介绍分析我国行政征收司法审查强度的现状和存在的问题。在对法律问题的审查上，存在外部体制没有理顺、法院对法律问题的解释权偏弱以及判例法律渊源地位未确立等问题。在对事实问题的审查上，存在法律审和事实审的争议，并重点分析了法院对事实问题的调查权力。在对行政裁量问题的审查上，存在将行政裁量与不确定法律概念混淆以及对滥用行政裁量权的监督不力等问题。第三章对我国行政征收司法审查应采取的审查强度提出了建议。针对征收目的、征收程序和征收补偿的审查强度提出改进意见，认为对三者应分别采取全面审查、合法性审查及合理性审查的强度标准。
[Abstract]:Administrative expropriation is a form of state power. It is a specific administrative act in which the state acquires or restricts the private property of citizens without the consent of the owner of the property for the needs of the public interest. Judicial review is a legal system in which the judicial organs review the legitimacy and rationality of the administrative acts made by the administrative organs and make corresponding rules. it is an important means to promote the administration according to law and maintain social fairness and justice. Based on the control of administrative collection power by judicial review, drawing lessons from the theory and practice of judicial review intensity in the two legal systems, starting with the judicial review of legal issues, factual problems and administrative discretion, this paper analyzes and discusses the present situation of the judicial review intensity of administrative expropriation in our country, and puts forward some suggestions on the judicial review intensity of administrative expropriation that should be taken in our country. This paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter is an overview. First of all, it clarifies the definition of administrative expropriation studied in this paper, that is, "according to the provisions of the law, the administrative subject acquires the property ownership of citizens, legal persons or other organizations by compulsory means for the purpose of social and public interests, or restricts the ownership of property, and gives fair compensation." Then, based on the comparative analysis of the theory of judicial review intensity in the two legal systems, the meaning of judicial review intensity, the main aspects and standards involved are discussed in detail. The second chapter mainly introduces and analyzes the present situation and existing problems of the judicial review intensity of administrative expropriation in our country. In the examination of legal issues, there are some problems, such as the external system has not been straightened out, the power of interpretation of legal issues by the court is weak and the status of the legal source of the case has not been established. In the examination of the factual problem, there are disputes between the legal trial and the factual trial, and the power of the court to investigate the factual issue is analyzed in detail. In the examination of the problem of administrative discretion, there are some problems, such as confusing the concept of administrative discretion with uncertain legal concepts and weak supervision of the abuse of administrative discretion. The third chapter puts forward some suggestions on the intensity of judicial review of administrative expropriation in our country. In view of the purpose of expropriation, the paper puts forward some suggestions for improving the intensity of expropriation procedure and expropriation compensation, and holds that the intensity standards of comprehensive review, legitimacy review and reasonableness review should be taken for the three purposes respectively.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D922.181;D921

【参考文献】