论民意与死刑存废之悖论
发布时间:2018-01-23 02:43
本文关键词: 死刑民意 死刑废除 替代措施 出处:《湖南工业大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:随着法治进程的不断推进,废除死刑不仅仅是国际社会发展的趋势,也是当代中国构建和谐社会,践行科学发展观的必然需求。死刑捍卫者将“民众不答应”作为坚持死刑的一大理由。本文就是以此为出发点,消除死刑废除需取得公众同意这样一种观点;树立另一种观点:死刑立法受制于死刑政策,死刑存废是由社会精英决定的。 本文综合从国内外死刑领域的历史和现状,通过分析美国、欧盟、香港的死刑去存废情况,在文章的第四部分形成一个新观点:无论是目前存在死刑的国家和地区还是废除死刑的国家和地区,实际上都不是因为民众的支持而存在或民众的反对而废除。死刑废除有其复杂而深刻的政治、历史、文化等因素,但本质上都是一个国家的死刑政策和社会精英的作用。 从现实的角度来看,,民意对死刑的存废确实具有影响作用,民众对死刑支持率也比较高。但从客观、理性的角度评价死刑民意却具有的滞后性、非理性等缺点,严重限制了死刑民意成为支撑死刑的依据。因此本文最后一部分就针对死刑民意所具有的变化性的特征提出了相应的民意引导措施,为死刑改革在民意方面明确方向。
[Abstract]:With the continuous advancement of the process of rule of law, abolishing the death penalty is not only the trend of international social development, but also the construction of a harmonious society in contemporary China. The necessity of practicing the scientific concept of development. The death penalty defenders regard "the public disallow" as a major reason to insist on the death penalty. This article takes this as the starting point to eliminate the death penalty abolition needs to obtain the public agreement such a kind of view; Establish another view: death penalty legislation is subject to death penalty policy, death penalty survival and abolition is determined by the social elite. This article synthetically from the domestic and foreign death penalty domain history and the present situation, through the analysis America, the European Union, the Hong Kong death penalty to save or abolish the situation. In the 4th part of the article formed a new point of view: whether the current existence of the death penalty countries and regions or abolitionist countries and regions. In fact, it is not abolished because of popular support or popular opposition. The abolition of the death penalty has its complex and profound political, historical, cultural and other factors. But it is essentially the death penalty policy of a country and the role of the social elite. From a realistic point of view, public opinion does have an impact on the existence and abolition of the death penalty, and the public support for the death penalty is also relatively high. But from an objective and rational point of view, the evaluation of public opinion on the death penalty has a lag. Irrationality and other shortcomings seriously limit the death penalty public opinion as the basis for supporting the death penalty. So the last part of this paper puts forward the corresponding public opinion guidance measures in view of the changing characteristics of the death penalty public opinion. Make clear the direction of public opinion for the death penalty reform.
【学位授予单位】:湖南工业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.12
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 张远煌;;我国死刑适用标准的缺陷及其弥补方法[J];法商研究;2006年06期
2 赵秉志;;中国短期内能否废止死刑问题要论[J];法学杂志;2009年08期
3 喻贵英;;欧洲死刑废除的启示[J];法学评论;2006年03期
4 曲新久;推动废除死刑:刑法学者的责任[J];法学;2003年04期
5 李唯;;浅析民意与死刑存废的命运[J];法制与社会;2007年01期
6 刘一亮;;民意视角下的死刑废除之路[J];江西青年职业学院学报;2007年01期
7 姚茂军;周茂春;;略论自由主义与西方民主政治[J];决策咨询通讯;2007年03期
8 王东阳;;当代中国死刑民意的状况、成因及其变革路径[J];刑法论丛;2008年02期
9 廖艳;宁立标;;法意与民意——佘祥林案的法理思考[J];邵阳学院学报;2006年01期
本文编号:1456469
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1456469.html