危害国家安全罪的规范缺失及立法补正

发布时间：2018-02-03 10:48

本文关键词： 危害国家安全罪国家安全规范缺失立法补正类型化　出处：《法商研究》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：随着国际安全态势的日趋严峻,危害国家安全的行为样态也逐渐复杂化。然而,我国刑法中危害国家安全犯罪的现行规范体系却呈规制不力之态。在频繁修法备受诘责的当前情势下,基于国家法益重大性及其保护迫切性之考虑,应在遵循解释权限划分原则的基础上,以立法解释的方式,对侵略等具有实质可罚性、但我国刑法尚未作出明确规定的危害国家安全行为,进行定性与定量方面的合理解释;对于"武装叛乱与武装暴乱、背叛、履行公务期间"等内涵指涉不清、外延模糊的立法术语,应明确其规范意旨,以利于做出是否构成犯罪以及构成何种犯罪的认定。对于部分罪名设置中的罪刑失衡问题,考虑到所涉及的国家法益的重大性,也应通过立法解释的方式予以补正,以提高刑法规范供给的有效性。
[Abstract]:With the increasingly serious international security situation, the behavior of endangering national security is becoming more and more complicated. In the current situation of frequent revision of the law, due to the importance of the interests of national law and the urgency of its protection consideration. On the basis of the principle of division of interpretation competence, we should have substantial punishment for aggression by way of legislative interpretation, but the criminal law of our country has not yet made clear the act of endangering national security. Reasonable explanation of qualitative and quantitative aspects; For "armed insurrection and armed riot, betrayal, performance of official duties" and other connotations refer to unclear, vague extension of the legislative terms, should be clear about its normative intent. In order to make the constitution of the crime and what kind of crime to determine. For some crimes in the establishment of the imbalance between the crime and punishment, taking into account the significance of the national legal interests involved. It should also be corrected by legislative interpretation to improve the effectiveness of the provision of criminal norms.
【作者单位】：沈阳师范大学法学院;
【基金】：中国法学会部级法学研究课题[CLS(2015)C28]
【分类号】：D924.3
【正文快照】： 随着在国际舞台上的日益崛起以及大国形象的逐渐形成,我国与传统大国、强国之间的竞争也日趋激烈,尤其是美国“重返亚太”战略的推行,使得我国在钓鱼岛、南海以及太空安全与网络安全等方面都面临严峻的考验。美国与韩国对“萨德系统”的强行推进,更是将国家安全这一事关国本的

【相似文献】