加功行为的主观侧面:从销售侵权复制品罪说起

发布时间：2018-02-03 14:46

本文关键词： 发行竞合加功通谋明知　出处：《中国发明与专利》2016年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国《刑法》中的侵犯著作权罪中的"发行"行为与销售侵权复制品罪缠混难分,问题的源头在于司法解释出于扩大犯罪圈的考量,将"复制发行"理解为"复制并发行"。对两罪不加区隔,仅通过想象竞合或法条竞合理论解释的进路要么违反罪刑法定,要么违反罪刑均衡,不具有妥当性。将"发行"脱离知识产权法律文本另做解释的方案违反了法秩序统一原则,引发诸多问题。应当根据加功行为的不同故意等级区分"通谋型"加功与"明知型"加功,二者均成立帮助犯,但"通谋型"的加功处罚更重,以此区分侵犯著作权罪中的"发行"与销售侵权复制品罪。
[Abstract]:In the Criminal Law of our country, the "issue" behavior in the crime of infringing copyright is difficult to be separated from the crime of selling infringing copies. The source of the problem lies in the consideration of expanding the criminal circle. "copy and issue" is understood as "copy and issue". It does not distinguish between the two crimes, but only through the theory of imaginative concurrence or the theory of law concurrence, either violates the legality of the crime, or violates the balance of the crime and punishment. It is not appropriate. The scheme of "issuing" without separate interpretation of intellectual property legal texts violates the principle of unification of legal order. It is necessary to distinguish the "collusion type" and "knowing type" according to the different grades of the behavior, both of which are regarded as aiding offenders, but the penalty of "collusion type" is heavier. In this way, the crime of "issuing" and selling infringing copies in the crime of infringing copyright is distinguished.
【分类号】：D924.3
【正文快照】： 一、问题提出《中华人民共和国刑法》(以下简称“《刑法》”)第二百一十七条侵犯著作权罪与第二百一十八条销售侵权复制品罪的区分问题由来已久。问题的争点就在于,一方面,我国《刑法》二百一十七条侵犯著作权罪中将“发行”作为侵犯著作权的行为范式之一;而根据我国《中华人

【相似文献】