虚假诉讼罪司法适用相关问题的思考

发布时间：2018-02-06 05:19

本文关键词： 虚假诉讼罪司法适用问题对策　出处：《甘肃政法学院》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：虚假诉讼行为人借助法院审判权而获得有利于自身的裁判,它在损害司法纯洁性与权威性的同时,也造成了他人合法权益的侵害。增设虚假诉讼罪,则势在必行。该罪不仅在债权债务合同领域多发,还涉及到婚姻、继承等家室领域、物权保护领域、知识产权领域等,几乎可以说人们日常生活所包含的民事领域都曾有过经典案例。其涉面范围之广、危害性之大就不言而喻了。但是,该罪名增设后学界与实务界并没有减少探讨,其争议点转向“关于该罪名在法律适用中的司法认定”等。本文从对该罪名所涉法条分析着手,结合实践中真实的案例,提出了该罪名在司法适用中所存在的问题,应怎样认定处理,以及完善该罪名司法适用的对策。具体来讲,本文共分为三部分:第一部分是关于虚假诉讼罪的概述。首先,对“虚假诉讼”的定义与分类进行分析,分别通过在民法学、刑法学和实务界中对“虚假诉讼”定义的评析,界定了“虚假诉讼”的内涵与外延;又结合案例分析虚假诉讼的分类及特征。其次,分析该罪名的构成要件与量刑设置:通过分析本部分,指出该罪名的概念、特征及法律条文所存在的不足,为第二章具体的认定做好铺垫。第二部分是关于虚假诉讼罪司法适用问题的认定。这也是本文的重点。首先,虚假诉讼罪客观方面的争议点:该罪所涉诉讼程序的范围、“以捏造事实提起诉讼”的理解、“妨害司法秩序”或“严重侵害他人合法权益”的理解,指出法条中应该完善之处。其次,分析了该罪犯罪形态中的“着手”与“预备”、既未遂标准。再次,分析该罪的共犯、数罪问题。最后,关于虚假诉讼罪与其他相关罪名的关系,着重分析了该罪与诈骗罪的关系。第三部分是关于完善虚假诉讼罪司法适用问题的对策。主要从法律和其他制度层面提出了可行性对策,希望能真正地规制该犯罪行为,还司法一份纯洁。
[Abstract]:The false litigant obtains the judgment in favor of himself with the help of the court jurisdiction, which not only damages the judicial purity and authority, but also results in the infringement of the legitimate rights and interests of others. This crime is not only in the field of creditor's rights and debt contracts, but also involves marriage, inheritance and other areas of family, real right protection, intellectual property field and so on. Almost can say that people's daily life contains the civil field has had the classical case, its scope is broad, the harmfulness is great self-evident. But. After the establishment of the crime, the academic and practical circles did not reduce the discussion, and its controversial point turned to "on the judicial determination of the crime in the application of the law". Combined with the real cases in practice, this paper puts forward the problems in the judicial application of this crime, how to identify and deal with it, as well as the countermeasures to perfect the judicial application of the crime. This paper is divided into three parts: the first part is an overview of the crime of false litigation. Firstly, the definition and classification of "false litigation" are analyzed, respectively through the civil law. In the field of criminal law and practice, the definition of "false litigation" is analyzed, and the connotation and extension of "false litigation" are defined. Combined with the case analysis of the classification and characteristics of false litigation. Secondly, this article analyzes the elements of the crime and sentencing settings: through the analysis of this part, points out the concept, characteristics and legal provisions of the shortcomings. The second part is about the identification of the judicial application of the crime of false litigation. This is also the focus of this paper. Disputes on the objective aspects of the crime of false litigation: the scope of the proceedings involved in the crime, the understanding of "bringing a lawsuit with fabricated facts", the understanding of "impairing the judicial order" or "seriously infringing upon the legitimate rights and interests of others". The article points out that the law should be perfected. Secondly, it analyzes the "start" and "preparation" in the form of the crime, which is not only the standard of attempt. Thirdly, it analyzes the accomplice of the crime and the problem of several crimes. Finally. The relationship between the crime of false litigation and other related charges. The third part is about the countermeasures to improve the judicial application of the crime of false litigation, mainly from the legal and other system level to put forward the feasible countermeasures. The hope can regulate this criminal behavior truly, return judicatory a pure.
【学位授予单位】：甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】