盗窃罪“非法占有目的”对象刍议

发布时间：2018-02-08 08:51

本文关键词： 非法占有目的取得占有要素排除占有要素物的存在形式物的价值　出处：《中外法学》2015年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：德日刑法判例与学说均否认盗窃罪的非法占有必须是永久或长久的占有。在不以长久占有为目的拿走物品的情形下,行为人所意图非法占有的究竟是什么?尤其是在以返还意图取得财物的占有的情形下,例如拿走被害人财物隐瞒财物来源向其售卖或者向其勒索赎金,可否认定非法占有目的,颇具争议。关于非法占有的对象,德国刑法的通说是以物的存在形式为主、(狭义的)物的价值说为辅的"综合说"。本文倡导利用这一理论对盗窃罪的非法占有目的所针对的对象进行界定,并针对上述情形提出以盗窃罪的规范保护目的思想认定狭义的物的价值说中的"特殊价值",以维护盗窃罪构成要件轮廓的清晰。与此相关,针对我国近年学界聚讼的盗窃信用卡并使用行为、针对财产性利益的"盗窃"等问题,此种探讨也引入了一个新的视角。
[Abstract]:German and Japanese criminal law case law and doctrine both deny that the illegal possession of theft must be permanent or long-term possession. In the case of not taking the object for the purpose of long-term possession, what is the intention of the perpetrator to illegally possess? In particular, in the case of possession with the intention of returning the property, such as taking away the victim's property, concealing the source of the property, or extorting ransom from the victim, it is controversial whether the purpose of illegal possession is to be determined. The general theory of German criminal law is the "comprehensive theory", which is supplemented by the theory of the value of goods in the form of existence of things (narrow sense). This paper advocates the use of this theory to define the object for which the purpose of illegal possession of theft is to be defined. In order to maintain the clear outline of the constitutive elements of larceny, this paper puts forward the idea of "special value" in the theory of the narrow sense of value of things in order to maintain the clear outline of the constitutive elements of the crime of larceny. This paper also introduces a new angle of view in view of the problems of theft of credit card and use of credit card, theft of property interests and so on.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】