刘某和柳某组织盗窃案的定性研究

发布时间：2018-02-14 05:24

本文关键词： 违反治安管理未成年人组织　出处：《重庆大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在2009年一项新的犯罪组织未成年人进行违反治安管理活动罪设立。该罪的设立对保护未成年人合法权益和维护社会秩序有着重要意义。由于该罪所涉及的内容众多，而有些内容司法解释没有进行明确规定，因此在进行法律适用时就会存在困难。对该罪进行研究不仅能清晰地认识该罪，更重要的是学以致用，在遇到与该罪相关的案件时能准确地进行判断。本文围绕与该罪相关的案例的认定展开，全文共分为五个部分进行论断。第一部分是论文的引言部分。第二部分，阐述了本案的案情以及对案件进行认定的四种不同观点，通过对这四种观点进行分析，得出了该案件的初步解析。第三部分，对组织未成年人进行违反治安管理活动罪进行了相应的研究。该部分又分为三个方面的内容。第一个方面的内容阐述了该罪的设立及其立法意义。第二个方面的内容阐述了该罪的构成要件，从主体构成要件、主观构成要件、客体构成要件及客观构成要件上对该罪进行了论述，尤其是对那些有争议的观点进行了论断。第三方面的内容阐述了该罪与拐骗儿童罪以及该罪与组织残疾人、儿童乞讨罪的关系。第四部分，对认定本案的四种观点没有评价到的两个问题进行了讨论，，一个是刘某和柳某指使学生打碎小车玻璃的行为如何认定，另一个是刘某和柳某是否构成传授犯罪方法罪。第五部分，通过前面的分析得出本案的认定结论。
[Abstract]:In 2009, a new criminal organization, minors, was established as a crime of violating the management of public security. The establishment of the crime is of great significance for the protection of the lawful rights and interests of minors and the maintenance of social order. Some of the content of the judicial interpretation is not clear provisions, so there will be difficulties in the application of the law. The study of the crime can not only clearly understand the crime, but also more important is to use it. This paper focuses on the determination of the cases related to the crime, which is divided into five parts. The first part is the introduction of the paper. The second part expounds the case of the case and four different views of the case, through the analysis of these four points of view, the preliminary analysis of the case. Part three, This part is divided into three aspects. The first part describes the establishment of the crime and its legislative significance. The content elaborated the constitution of the crime, The crime is discussed in terms of subjective, subjective, objective and objective elements. The third part expounds the relationship between the crime and the crime of abduction of children and the crime of organizing disabled persons and children begging. In the 4th part, the author discusses two problems that were not evaluated from the four viewpoints in this case. One is how Liu and Liu instructed students to break the car glass. Another is whether Liu and Liu constitute a crime of imparting criminal methods. Part 5th, through the above analysis, the conclusion of the case.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.14;D924.35;D920.5

【参考文献】