论编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪

发布时间：2018-02-23 19:47

本文关键词： 编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪虚假恐怖信息选择性罪名牵连犯　出处：《华东政法大学》2009年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪,是全国人大常委会于2001年12月29日颁布的《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(三)》第八条(即修正后的刑法第二百九十一条之一)新增的一个罪名。近年来,编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪的案件在全国范围内频发,较之上述修正案颁布之前,其发案率呈明显上升的态势。此类犯罪往往针对的是政府、社会组织等公共机构,公司、企业等有影响力的单位,以及商场、宾馆等公共场所,涉及面相对较广、影响较大、危害后果严重。因此,必须依法严厉打击此类犯罪。但由于本罪是新增罪相对于其他传统犯罪而言是一个较新或者说是较偏的罪名,相关司法解释较少,在司法实践中经常会出现一些新情况新问题,可能会在认识上产生分歧,致使该罪在司法适用上出现不统一、不均衡的现象。尤其在针对本罪的构成要件、选择性罪名问题及其适用、利用本罪的行为实施敲诈勒索犯罪的定性等问题上,理论界和实务界都没有形成统一的认识,仁者见仁,智者见智,仍然处于争论的状态。对于一个新增罪名来说,理论界有研究有争论是可以的,甚至是十分有益的;但是在司法实践中,这种争论持续的状态必然会影响刑事司法实际效果。因此,本文本着理论研究应尽量服务于实践的原则,在总结前人研究成果的基础上,结合自己在法院实习所接触到的案例,提出自己的一孔之见,以求对我国的法制建设和刑法理论的完善贡献个人微薄之力。本文分为四部分,约三万一千字。第一部分,引言。该部分介绍了编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪在我国理论界的研究现状和司法实践现状,研究该罪名的意义,以及应注意的主要问题,引出本文论题。第二部分,编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪概述。该部分首先介绍了编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪的立法沿革;其次通过我国关于编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪的第一案来介绍该罪的概念和特点;最后分析了编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪的属性,是否完全定性为恐怖活动犯罪。第三部分,编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪的构成要件。该部分侧重分析了编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪构成要件中的难点问题,分为三个部分:首先是该罪的客体方面讨论了其犯罪客体和犯罪对象;其次是该罪的客观方面讨论了“虚假恐怖信息”的定性、“编造、故意传播”的含义和“严重扰乱社会秩序、造成严重后果”的认定问题;最后是该罪的主观方面的问题讨论。第四部分,编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪的司法适用。该部分首先讨论了关于该罪是否为选择性罪名,该罪的具体罪名确定问题;其次讨论了该罪与其他相关罪名的界限;最后讨论了以编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息的方式敲诈钱财的行为定性,包括定性依据和具体重罪轻罪的衡量。
[Abstract]:The crime of fabricating and deliberately disseminating false terrorist information, In December 29th 2001, the standing Committee of the National people's Congress promulgated the Criminal Law Amendment of the people's Republic of China (3) > 8th articles (that is, one of the 291th articles of the amended Criminal Law). The crime of intentionally disseminating false terrorist information frequently occurs throughout the country. Compared with before the above amendments were promulgated, the incidence of such crimes is obviously increasing. This kind of crime is often directed at the government, social organizations, and other public institutions and companies. Enterprises and other influential units, as well as shopping malls, hotels and other public places, involving a relatively wide, big impact, serious consequences. Therefore, we must crack down on such crimes according to law. However, as this new crime is a relatively new or partial crime compared with other traditional crimes, there are few judicial explanations, and there are often some new situations and new problems in judicial practice, which may lead to differences in understanding. It causes the disunity and imbalance in the application of justice, especially in the aspects of the constitutive elements of the crime, the problem of the selective charge and its application, the qualitative analysis of the crime of extortion by using the act of this crime, and so on. The theorists and the practitioners have not formed a unified understanding, different people see benevolence, different wisdom, still in the state of argument. For a new charge, it is possible for the theorists to have research and debate, even very useful; However, in judicial practice, this state of argument will inevitably affect the actual effect of criminal justice. Therefore, based on the principle that theoretical research should serve practice as far as possible, and on the basis of summarizing the previous research results, Combining with the case that he has come into contact with in court practice, this paper puts forward his own opinion in a hole in order to contribute to the construction of legal system and the perfection of criminal law theory in our country. This article is divided into four parts, about 31,000 words. The first part is the introduction. This part introduces the current research situation and judicial practice of the crime of fabricating and intentionally disseminating false terrorist information in our country, the significance of the crime and the main problems that should be paid attention to, which leads to the topic of this paper. The second part is an overview of the crime of fabricating and intentionally disseminating false terrorist information. This part first introduces the legislative evolution of the crime of fabricating and intentionally disseminating false terrorist information; secondly, through our country's legislation on fabricating, The first case of the crime of intentionally disseminating false terrorist information introduces the concept and characteristics of the crime; finally, it analyzes the nature of the crime of fabricating and intentionally disseminating false terrorist information, whether it is completely defined as a crime of terrorist activity. The third part, the constitutive elements of the crime of fabricating, intentionally propagating false terrorist information. This part focuses on the analysis of the difficult problems in the constitutive elements of the crime of fabricating and intentionally disseminating false terrorist information. It is divided into three parts: first, the object of the crime discusses the object of the crime and the object of the crime; secondly, the objective aspect of the crime discusses the characterization of "false terrorist information". The definition of "intentional communication" and the problem of "seriously disturbing the social order and causing serious consequences"; finally, the discussion on the subjective aspects of the crime. Part 4th, the judicial application of the crime of fabricating and intentionally disseminating false terrorist information. This part first discusses whether the crime is a selective crime and the problem of determining the specific charge of the crime, and then discusses the boundary between the crime and other related charges. Finally, the author discusses the characterization of extortion by fabricating and deliberately disseminating false terrorist information, including the qualitative basis and the measurement of specific felony misdemeanours.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】