论死缓犯限制减刑制度
发布时间:2018-02-27 16:35
本文关键词: 死缓犯 限制减刑 正当性根据 问题及对策 出处:《山东大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:《刑法修正案(八)》确立了死缓犯限制减刑制度,这一制度是针对某些具体犯罪对死缓制度的一个完善,更是对死刑制度的发展。死缓犯限制减刑制度属于死缓制度的范畴,它是对原判刑罚执行变更的预设性判决,而减刑属于刑罚的执行制度,是对原判刑罚的执行变更。罪名确定,针对性强;选择适用,而非必用;一旦适用,不可逆转;细化死缓,平衡体系是死缓犯限制减刑制度的特点。 在死缓犯限制减刑制度实施之前,死刑体系内一直存在的“生刑过轻,死刑过重”问题十分严重。在死刑立即执行和死刑缓期执行之间没有一个过渡,一生一死,结果悬殊。对此,我们需要从制度上细化,强化生刑的惩罚力度,来缓和“生死两重天”的矛盾。而死缓犯限制减刑制度便是针对这一问题的解决措施。 它不仅有利于缓解“生刑过轻、死刑过重”的问题,而且顺应了人权保护和废除死刑的国际化发展趋势,更是适用了罪责刑相适应的刑法原则,确保罪犯受到的惩罚和他所犯下的罪行相当。此外,死缓犯限制减刑制度还可以引导民众的死刑观念、改变他们对死缓制度的看法。 任何制度都不可能是十全十美的,绝对不可能是放之四海而皆准的,所以这一制度还存在一些问题,需要我们加以改进和完善。正确适用该制度的前提是正确适用死刑制度和死缓制度,但是死刑缓期执行与死刑立即执行区别标准的模糊以及死缓限制减刑与否标准的模糊加大了适用死缓犯限制减刑制度的难度。此外,在立法领域,也存在很多问题,可以供我们大家探讨,比如死缓犯限制减刑制度适用的范围过窄,死缓犯限制减刑制度不可逆转性的问题。 针对本文提出的几点问题,笔者提出了以下几点设想:首先明确适用标准、规范法官的自由裁量权;在司法实践中,严格践行罪刑法定的原则;同时适当放宽死缓犯限制减刑制度的不可逆转性,讨论扩大制度适用范围为的可行性。
[Abstract]:The amendment of the Criminal Law (8) establishes the system of limiting commutation of death row offenders, which is a perfect system for certain specific crimes and the development of death penalty system. The system of limitation and commutation of death penalty belongs to the category of death reprieve system. It is the default judgment of the original penalty execution change, and commutation belongs to the execution system of the penalty, it is the execution change of the original sentence penalty, the crime is determined, the pertinence is strong, the choice is applicable, not the necessary use, once applied, irreversible; The system of remitting death penalty and balance system is the characteristic of the system of limiting commutation of death penalty. Before the implementation of the system of limiting commutation of death row offenders, the problem of "too light birth punishment and excessive death penalty" in the death penalty system had been very serious. There was no transition between the immediate execution of the death penalty and the suspension of execution of the death penalty. For this reason, we need to refine the system and strengthen the punishment of birth and death to ease the contradiction of "death and death", and the system of restraining commutation of death penalty is the solution to this problem. It not only helps to alleviate the problem of "too light birth punishment and excessive death penalty", but also conforms to the international development trend of human rights protection and abolition of the death penalty, and it also applies the principle of criminal law, which adapts to crime, responsibility and punishment. Ensure that the offender is punished in the same way as the crime he committed. In addition, the system of limiting commutation of the death penalty can also lead to the public's concept of the death penalty and change their view of the death penalty suspension system. No system can be perfect, it can never be universally applicable. Therefore, there are still some problems in this system. The correct application of the system is premised on the proper application of the death penalty system and the system of suspension of death penalty, However, the ambiguity of the standard of the difference between the suspended execution of the death penalty and the immediate execution of the death penalty, as well as the ambiguity of the standard of whether or not to limit the commutation of the death penalty, make it more difficult to apply the system of limiting the commutation of the sentence for the death penalty offenders. In addition, in the legislative field, there are. It can be discussed by all of us, for example, the scope of limitation of commutation of death penalty is too narrow, and the irreversibility of restriction of commutation of death penalty. In view of the problems raised in this paper, the author puts forward the following tentative ideas: first of all, make clear the applicable standards, standardize the discretion of the judge, strictly practice the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime in judicial practice, and put forward the following ideas: first, make clear the applicable standards and standardize the discretion of the judge; At the same time, the irreversibility of the restriction of commutation of death penalty is relaxed, and the feasibility of enlarging the scope of application of the system is discussed.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 马克昌;论死刑缓期执行[J];中国法学;1999年02期
,本文编号:1543464
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1543464.html