当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

“网络碰瓷”行为的刑法定性分析

发布时间:2018-02-27 19:22

  本文关键词: 网络碰瓷 刑事犯罪 规制 出处:《安徽大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:"网络碰瓷"作为"碰瓷"中的一种新类型,是近年来"碰瓷"中的热门话题,是伴随着网络技术的发展、网络购物的兴起而出现的。"网络碰瓷"问题既是一个理论问题,也是一个实践问题。在理论界,学者专业性的研究较少,研究成果更少,有许多的盲点、空白点需要填充,例如成因分析、表现形式和触及罪名分析;在实践中,办理"网路碰瓷"类案件主要有"三难"问题需要解决,即调查难、取证难和认定难。以此为选题,在全面分析"网络碰瓷"的成因、表现形式和特点的基础之上,重点阐述"网络碰瓷"构成刑事犯罪的刑法理论基础和罪名分析,最后提出具有针对性的建议,不仅可以促进大众对"网络碰瓷"的深入了解,更可以为理论研究和司法实践提供借鉴、参考,从而更好地遏制、打击"网络碰瓷"行为。具体来说,首先,在表现形式方面,通过列举具有代表性的"网络碰瓷"事例,介绍了"网络碰瓷"中最为常见、最为典型的恶意差评式"碰瓷"、恶意退货式"碰瓷"和恶意投诉式"碰瓷"三种形式,可以囊括绝大多数的"网络碰瓷"行为。其次,本文认为"网络碰瓷"行为在刑事方面构成犯罪,根据犯罪的刑事违法性、社会危害性和应受刑罚处罚性的三大特征进行理论分析,并详细地分析了三种常见形式可能触及的罪名,倾向于认为构成敲诈勒索罪和保险诈骗罪。最后,在前面的成因分析、特点和构成刑事犯罪的理论分析的基础之上,提出了针对性、可行性较强的建议,特别是微观上的刑法建议,通过改进刑事侦查手段、规范网络电子数据证据形式等有利于解决"三难"问题;提出了"被告就原告"的原则,解决管辖问题,更有利于"网络碰瓷"受害者及时有效的维护自己的合法权益,降低维权成本,更切合受害者的意愿;罪数认定时,在牵连犯的择一重罪处罚原则的基础之上增加数罪并罚的处罚原则,不再是一刀切,有利于全面、准确的认定罪数、罪名,更好地践行罪刑法定的基本原则。
[Abstract]:"Pengci" network "as a new type of pengci", in recent years, "pengci" is a hot topic, with the development of network technology, the rise of online shopping and the emergence of the "pengci. Not only is the network" a theoretical problem, but also a practical problem. In theory, research professional scholars less, less research results, there are many blind spots and gaps need to be filled, for example, cause analysis, analysis of manifestation and touched the accusation; in practice, for the "pengci network" cases are three difficult problems to be solved, namely the investigation difficult, hard evidence and difficult to identify on this topic. A comprehensive analysis on the causes of "network, pengci", based on the form and characteristics, focusing on the theoretical basis of criminal law and crime analysis network pengci "constitute a criminal offense, and finally puts forward pertinent suggestions, can not only promote the mass of" pengci network" The more in-depth understanding, can provide reference for theoretical research and judicial practice, so as to better curb, combat the "network pengci" behavior. Specifically, first of all, in the form of expression, through the list of representative "pengci" examples, introduced the "pengci network" is the most common, the most the typical malicious bad "pengci", "pengci" malicious return and malicious complaints "pengci" three forms, can include most of the "pengci" behavior. Secondly, this article holds that the "network pengci" behavior constitutes a crime in the criminal, according to criminal law crime, three characteristics social harm and criminal punishment of the theoretical analysis, and detailed analysis of the three common forms may reach charges, tend to think that constitute the crime of insurance fraud and the crime of blackmail and impose exactions on. After the analysis, in front of the causes, characteristics and criminal Based on the analysis of the crime theory, put forward feasible suggestions, especially the criminal law, suggestions on the micro, through the improvement of criminal investigation means, regulate the network form of electronic data evidence to solve the "three problems"; put forward "the plaintiff's" principle, to solve the problem of jurisdiction, more conducive to "if the victim network timely and effectively safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, reduce the cost of rights, more in line with the victim's intention; number of the crime, increase the punishment principle on the basis of the number of crimes implicated felony punishment principle, is not conducive to a comprehensive, across the board, on charges of crime number, accurately identify the. Better practice the basic principles of statutory crime.

【学位授予单位】:安徽大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前1条

1 袁源;张永汀;;职业差评师——游离于法律与规则边缘的网络灰色职业群体[J];中国青年研究;2014年06期

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 孟秋红;故意毁坏财物罪若干问题研究[D];云南大学;2015年

2 赵丹;敲诈勒索罪若干问题研究[D];吉林大学;2015年

3 杨杰栋;敲诈勒索罪案研究[D];黑龙江大学;2015年

4 赵昌禄;刑法学视角下的“碰瓷”行为[D];黑龙江大学;2015年

5 高健;损害商业信誉、商品声誉罪疑难问题探究[D];华东政法大学;2015年

6 叶封高;互联网环境下诽谤罪的认定[D];华东政法大学;2015年

7 李泽语;保险诈骗罪的认定问题探究[D];西南政法大学;2015年

8 黄翠;诽谤罪边界问题研究[D];西南政法大学;2015年

9 陈磊;“碰瓷”行为的定性分析[D];湖南师范大学;2014年

10 汪越;论“碰瓷”行为的法律规制[D];华中科技大学;2014年



本文编号:1543989

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1543989.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户58a0c***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com