当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

侵占罪司法实践中争议问题的研究

发布时间:2018-03-10 21:36

  本文选题:侵占罪 切入点:财物 出处:《天津师范大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:侵占罪的本质特征在于将占有的他人财物非法据为己有,侵占罪的认定与占有制度紧密相连。本文基于刑法对侵占罪的规定,结合司法实践中的具体情形,围绕理论研究中所存在的难题,分三部分对侵占罪的对象、客观要件和司法认定进行分析和探讨,力图能够得出最符合我国现实的结论。 第一部分是对侵占罪的犯罪对象的探讨。认同委托物侵占的对象为代为保管的他人财物,代为保管是反映事实上的某种占有关系,与占有关系是否合法无关。此外本章还针对遗忘物与埋藏物如何界定进行了探讨。 第二部分是围绕着侵占罪的客观方面展开,通过分析非法占为己有和拒不退还或拒不交出的含义、表现形式等方面的特点,结合理论界各种说法,提出了拒不退还或拒不交出应为侵占罪构成要件等看法。 第三部分主要针对司法实践中侵占罪的认定提出自己的看法,突出研究了侵占罪与民法中相关规定的区分,重点分析了侵占罪与盗窃罪在司法实践中的区别,在这一问题中,着重总结了侵占罪存在于法律实践中的具体形态及其与盗窃罪等相关罪名易混淆的部分,以求能为法律实践中侵占罪的准确认定提供帮助。
[Abstract]:The essential characteristic of the crime of embezzlement lies in the illegal appropriation of the property of others in possession, and the identification of the crime of embezzlement is closely related to the system of possession. This article is based on the provisions of the criminal law on the crime of embezzlement, combined with the specific situation in judicial practice. Focusing on the problems existing in the theoretical research, this paper analyzes and discusses the object, objective elements and judicial cognizance of the crime of embezzlement in three parts, in order to reach the conclusion that is most in line with the reality of our country. The first part is the discussion of the object of crime of embezzlement. This chapter also discusses how to define forgotten objects and buried objects. The second part focuses on the objective aspects of the crime of embezzlement, through the analysis of the meaning of illegal appropriation and refusal to return or surrender, the form of expression and other aspects of the characteristics, combined with the theory of various statements. The author puts forward that refusing to return or not to surrender should be the constitutive elements of the crime of embezzlement. The third part focuses on the identification of embezzlement in judicial practice, highlighting the distinction between the crime of embezzlement and the relevant provisions of the civil law, focusing on the analysis of the difference between the crime of embezzlement and the crime of theft in judicial practice. This paper summarizes the concrete forms of the crime of embezzlement in the legal practice and its confusing parts with the related charges such as theft in order to provide help for the accurate identification of the crime of embezzlement in the legal practice.
【学位授予单位】:天津师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 郑丽萍;论侵占罪的犯罪对象及其立法完善[J];北京市政法管理干部学院学报;2003年01期

2 陈立;非法占有遗忘物行为问题新论[J];法学杂志;2001年04期

3 王作富;略论侵占罪的几个问题[J];法学杂志;1998年01期

4 杜国强;关于侵占罪若干问题的思考[J];法学评论;2002年06期

5 刘三木;关于侵占罪客观行为方面几个争议问题的探讨[J];法学评论;2005年06期

6 叶希善;侵占遗忘物和盗窃遗忘物的区别新议——修正的二重控制论[J];法学;2005年08期

7 吴占英;伊士国;;我国立法的价值取向初探[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2009年03期

8 罗斌;刘少夫;;侵占罪中的埋藏物之辨析[J];法制与社会;2012年33期

9 田明海,毕秀丽;如何认定侵占罪中的“拒不退还”[J];河北法学;2000年02期

10 冯兆蕙;侵占罪论[J];河北法学;2002年05期



本文编号:1595171

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1595171.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户6080a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com