“双层社会”背景下侵犯著作权罪定罪量刑标准新构——基于306份刑事判决书的实证分析

发布时间：2018-03-16 03:33

本文选题：侵犯著作权罪　切入点：定罪量刑标准　出处：《政治与法律》2015年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：通过对中国裁判文书网306件侵犯著作权罪刑事判决书的分析可以得出:在"传统社会"与"网络社会"并存的"双层社会"背景下,侵犯著作权罪定罪量刑标准选择较为混乱且普遍存在量刑失衡。从表面看,产生此问题的原因是不断增加的司法解释对定罪量刑标准的增加以及各标准之间的难以转化。其问题的实质根源在于立法与司法之间在侵犯著作权罪法益保护上的错乱。侵犯著作权罪有必要转变为以保护著作权人的利益为主。相应地,刑法有必要确立侵犯著作权罪定罪量刑标准"类型固定+数额浮动"的模式,具体而言是指立法上固定以著作权人所遭受的损失程度为定罪量刑标准,定罪量刑参照的具体数额标准则由司法部门结合社会经济发展情况并经实证统计分析后再作科学规定。
[Abstract]:Based on the analysis of 306 criminal judgments of copyright infringement in China's adjudicative documents network, it can be concluded that under the background of "traditional society" and "network society" co-existing, The choice of sentencing criteria for the crime of infringing copyright is chaotic and there is a general imbalance in sentencing. The reason for this problem lies in the increasing number of judicial interpretations and the difficulty in transforming the standards of conviction and sentencing. The essence of the problem lies in the protection of legal interests between legislation and judicature in the crime of infringing on copyright. It is necessary to change the crime of infringing copyright into one that focuses on the protection of the interests of the copyright owner. Accordingly, It is necessary for the criminal law to establish the mode of "fixed amount floating" in the standard of conviction and sentencing for the crime of infringing copyright. Specifically, it means that the standard of conviction and sentencing should be fixed on the basis of the degree of loss suffered by the copyright owner in legislation. The specific amount standard of the conviction and sentencing reference shall be scientifically stipulated by the judicial department in combination with the social and economic development and through the empirical statistical analysis.
【作者单位】：福建省厦门市集美区人民法院;
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】