论交通肇事罪自首的争议问题

发布时间：2018-03-17 13:00

本文选题：交通肇事罪　切入点：自首　出处：《天津师范大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：近年来,交通肇事犯罪案件数量日益增多,然而,关于交通肇事罪的自首问题,学界尚存争论,这直接导致了司法实践中的不统一,严重影响了法律的权威性,更引发了社会的强烈关注。然而在司法实践中,交通肇事罪能否适用自首,何种情况排除自首适用的问题常常引发争论。面对肇事者在肇事后保护现场、抢救伤者、向公安机关报告的行为符合行政法规的前置义务条件下,是否能认定自首?目前实践中各地区对于交通肇事罪的自首规定的适用情形不一,在量刑上更是不一致,为保障犯罪嫌疑人的合法权益,我们应当准确理解与把握交通肇事罪的相关问题,因此也有必要展开深入讨论,以避免消极后果。本文谨就此问题展开论述,结合实践中存在的各种案例,讨论交通肇事罪自首成立的司法认定。采用文献综述、数据分析以及案例分析的论证方法,得出肯定的答案,再对自首成立的范围进行论证,然后确定交通肇事罪的认定标准,尤其是对部分争议情形进行认定,最后再对交通肇事罪自首的处理进行原则上的梳理。在文章的第三部分,本文结合当前交通肇事罪刑罚宽缓“轻刑化”的现象,提出相应的解决方案,以期该罪在适用自首制度时能够做到刑罚相当,既有效地打击了犯罪,同时又实现了刑法功利之要求,有利于感召罪犯,从而真正做到宽严相济。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the number of traffic accident crime cases is increasing day by day. However, there is still controversy in the academic circles about the traffic accident crime surrender, which directly leads to the disunity of judicial practice and seriously affects the authority of the law. It also aroused the strong concern of the society. However, in judicial practice, the question of whether the traffic accident crime can be applied to surrender and what kind of circumstances exclude the application of voluntary surrender often lead to controversy. In the face of the perpetrators protecting the scene after the accident and rescuing the injured, Under the condition that the behavior reported to the public security organ is in accordance with the pre-obligation of the administrative regulations, can it be determined that the person surrendered himself? At present, in practice, the application of the voluntary surrender of traffic accident crime in various regions is different, and the sentencing is even more inconsistent. In order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the criminal suspects, we should accurately understand and grasp the relevant problems of the traffic accident crime. It is therefore also necessary to engage in in-depth discussions in order to avoid negative consequences. This article would like to discuss this question, combined with the existence of various cases in practice, to discuss the establishment of the traffic accident crime of judicial cognizance. Using literature review, data analysis and case analysis of the argumentation method, get the affirmative answer. Then it demonstrates the scope of the establishment of voluntary surrender, and then determines the criteria for the identification of traffic accident crime, especially for some controversial cases, and finally combs in principle the handling of traffic accident crime voluntary surrender. In the third part of the article, Combined with the phenomenon of lenient punishment in the current traffic accident crime, this paper puts forward the corresponding solution, in the hope that the crime can be punished equally when applying the surrender system, which has effectively cracked down on the crime. At the same time, realized the criminal law utilitarian requirements, is conducive to the call of criminals, so as to truly achieve leniency and strict punishment.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3;D924.1

【参考文献】