当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

受贿罪争议问题研究

发布时间:2018-03-19 12:21

  本文选题:受贿罪保护法益 切入点:“贿赂”范围 出处:《上海师范大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:受贿罪是历史上出现较早的职务犯罪之一,虽然中外刑法学者们的研究不断深入,但对受贿罪的若干问题在理论上仍然存有分歧。在借鉴有关资料和联系司法实践的基础上,笔者对受贿罪的保护法益、受贿罪“贿赂”范围、受贿罪的“为他人谋取利益”要件、受贿罪的既遂标准等问题的争议内容进行了分析研究,同时提出自己的主张和建议。全文共分为五个部分: 第一部分,主要介绍了境内外对受贿罪的研宄现状,从而概况了笔者撰写本文的的背景,以及写作意义。 第二部分,对受贿罪保护法益的国内外学说进行梳理,对争议的焦点给予评析,并从不同的法律视角进行论证,最终得出自己支持的观点,即国家工作人员职务行为的不可收买性为受贿罪所要保护的法益、 第三部分,评析了国内外关于“贿赂”范围的学说,并从受贿罪保护的法益、我国的司法实践、域外相关立法角度对“贿赂”范围进行分析,得出我国应当通过立法确定不正当利益说的结论。 第四部分,从学理的角度对受贿罪的“为他人谋取利益”要件展开论述。对我国关于"为他人谋取利益”的有关法律规定进行分析,并就实践中存在的问题进行了列举。最后阐述自己的观点,即取消“为他人谋取利益”的要件地位,即便要留存,也只是将这一元素作为量刑情节。 第五部分,对受贿罪的既遂标准学说进行了评析,并从受贿罪保护的法益、受贿罪的犯罪目的和犯罪结果、以及犯罪既遂理论的通说角度分析,提出了受贿罪既遂标准应是贿赂取得,并得出贿赂取得的标准是控制说的观点。
[Abstract]:The crime of accepting bribes is one of the early duty crimes in history. Although the research of Chinese and foreign criminal law scholars has been deepening, there are still differences on some problems of bribery crime in theory. On the basis of drawing lessons from relevant information and connecting with judicial practice, The author analyzes and studies the protection benefits of bribery crime, the scope of bribery crime, the elements of bribery crime "seeking benefits for others", the standard of accomplishing bribery crime, and so on. At the same time put forward their own ideas and suggestions. The full text is divided into five parts:. In the first part, the author introduces the present situation of the crime of accepting bribes at home and abroad, and summarizes the background and significance of the author's writing of this article. The second part, the domestic and foreign theories of bribery protection law are combed, the focus of the dispute is analyzed, and the argument is made from different legal perspectives, and finally the viewpoint supported by oneself is obtained. That is, the non-acquisitive nature of the duties of state functionaries is the legal interest to be protected by the crime of accepting bribes, The third part analyzes the scope of bribery at home and abroad, and analyzes the scope of bribery from the perspective of the legal interests of bribery protection, judicial practice, and foreign legislation. Draw the conclusion that our country should pass legislation to determine the theory of improper interests. Part 4th, from the perspective of theory, discusses the elements of "seeking benefits for others" in the crime of accepting bribes, and analyzes the relevant legal provisions on "seeking benefits for others" in our country. Finally, the author expounds his own viewpoint, that is, canceling the status of "seeking benefits for others", even if it should be retained, it only takes this element as the circumstances of sentencing. In the 5th part, the author analyzes the theory of the accomplished standard of the crime of accepting bribes, and analyzes the legal benefits of the crime of bribery, the purpose and result of the crime of accepting bribes, and the general theory of accomplished crime. The author puts forward that the standard of accomplishing bribery should be bribery, and concludes that the standard of bribery is control.
【学位授予单位】:上海师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.392

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 肖中华;;论单位受贿罪与单位行贿罪的认定[J];法治研究;2013年05期

2 徐留成;;受贿罪既遂与未遂的疑难问题研究[J];河南社会科学;2008年05期

3 邱兴隆;一个半公正的司法解释——兼与苏力教授对话[J];法学研究;2004年06期

4 陈兴良;;新型受贿罪的司法认定:以刑事指导案例(潘玉梅、陈宁受贿案)为视角[J];南京师大学报(社会科学版);2013年01期

5 冯志恒;;贿赂犯罪中间人的刑法处理[J];兰州大学学报(社会科学版);2013年04期

6 韩建国;韦亚力;;受贿罪客体新论[J];法学研究;1991年03期

7 陈正云,刁玉锋;控制腐败犯罪的刑事立法政策探析[J];人民检察;2004年04期

8 夏强;论“为他人谋取利益”在受贿罪中的地位及其认定[J];行政与法;2001年01期

9 王作富,陈兴良;受贿罪构成新探[J];政法论坛;1991年01期

10 张明楷;论受贿罪中的“为他人谋取利益”[J];政法论坛;2004年05期



本文编号:1634246

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1634246.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户79984***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com