民事欺诈与刑事诈骗的比较研究
发布时间:2018-03-20 07:41
本文选题:刑事诈骗 切入点:民事欺诈 出处:《南昌大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:“欺诈”与“诈骗”,是两个意义相近却又各不相同的词语,这两个原本难分彼此的概念随着现代市场经济的发展与法律制度的完善,各自具有了自己的归属,在日常生活中,欺诈偏向了民事法律领域,而诈骗则被纳入了刑事法律的调整范围,这种分化形成了两种新的概念——民事欺诈与刑事诈骗。无论是刑事诈骗还是民事欺诈其目的都是通过虚构事实,采用欺骗的手段,从而骗取他人的钱财,这两种行为都损害了市场的公平交易和诚实信用,使被害一方遭受经济损失。为了整顿市场经济秩序活动,保障社会经济安全,刑事诈骗和民事欺诈无一例外的被列为了法律的重点调整对象。 刑事诈骗和民事欺诈有一个共同的关键词——“欺骗”,这是一个自人类社会诞生之初就一直存在的事物,作为人类社会属性的一种负面表现形式,“欺骗”行为长期受到社会道德的谴责。如果将“欺骗”行为比作一棵树的主干,那么刑事诈骗和民事欺诈则是这一主干上的两条分支,,其生长路线并非完全相同,而在这两条分支上又各自结出了果实,形成了繁茂各异的植株。刑事诈骗和民事欺诈在内涵和外延上的区别造就了法律对这两种行为规定的差异,而对于当事人来说,一方面由于民事、刑事法律对刑事诈骗和民事欺诈处理方式的不同,致使被害人寻求救济的途径有所不同;另一方面随着法制的进一步完善,对不法行为人权益的保护也要求将刑事诈骗这种严重刑事违法与民事欺诈这类普通民事违法区别开来。因此,研究刑事诈骗与民事欺诈的涵义,准确把握二者之间的界限,在充分保障各方正当权益的前提下,打击违法犯罪,对维护市场秩序,保持经济稳定,促进社会主义市场经济健康有序的发展具有重要的意义。
[Abstract]:"Fraud" and "Fraud" are two words with similar meanings but different meanings. With the development of the modern market economy and the perfection of the legal system, these two concepts have their own ownership in their daily life. Fraud is biased in the field of civil law, and fraud is included in the adjustment of criminal law. This division has formed two new concepts-civil fraud and criminal fraud. Both criminal fraud and civil fraud are designed to defraud other people's money through fictitious facts and deception. Both of these acts have damaged the fair trade and good faith of the market, and caused the injured party to suffer economic losses. In order to rectify the market economic order and ensure social and economic security, Criminal fraud and civil fraud without exception have been listed as the focus of the law. Criminal fraud and civil fraud have a common keyword "deception", a thing that has existed since the beginning of human society. As a negative manifestation of human social attributes, "deception" has long been condemned by social morality. If "deceptive" behavior is compared to the trunk of a tree, criminal fraud and civil fraud are two branches of this trunk. Its growth path is not exactly the same, and the two branches bear fruit and form different and lush plants. The difference in connotation and extension between criminal fraud and civil fraud has resulted in the difference between the two kinds of acts stipulated by law. For the parties concerned, on the one hand, as a result of the difference of civil, criminal law on criminal fraud and civil fraud, the ways for victims to seek redress are different; on the other hand, with the further improvement of the legal system, The protection of the rights and interests of the wrongdoer also requires the distinction between the serious criminal offence of criminal fraud and the ordinary civil law such as civil fraud. Therefore, it is necessary to study the meaning of criminal fraud and civil fraud, and accurately grasp the boundary between the two. On the premise of fully protecting the legitimate rights and interests of all parties, it is of great significance to crack down on illegal crimes and to maintain market order, maintain economic stability and promote the healthy and orderly development of socialist market economy.
【学位授予单位】:南昌大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.3;D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 黎全阳;;关于诈骗罪认定若干争议问题的探讨[J];法学家;1996年02期
2 刘远;;欺诈犯罪原理探究[J];法学家;2000年05期
3 刘明祥;论诈骗罪中的交付财产行为[J];法学评论;2001年02期
4 陈增宝;诈骗犯罪非法占有目的的认定方法探究[J];人民检察;2004年06期
5 花克明;“以非法占有为目的”的正确认定[J];人民检察;1998年08期
6 徐志军;张传伟;;欺诈的界分[J];政法论坛;2006年04期
7 董玉庭;论诉讼诈骗及其刑法评价[J];中国法学;2004年02期
本文编号:1638117
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1638117.html