“起哄闹事型”寻衅滋事罪研究

发布时间：2018-03-22 17:14

本文选题：起哄闹事　切入点：寻衅滋事罪　出处：《苏州大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：我国刑法第293条规定的寻衅滋事罪是从1979年刑法中的流氓罪中演变出来的，现行寻衅滋事罪有四种表现形式，其中“起哄闹事型”寻衅滋事罪具有一定的代表性，但受到的关注较少。2013年两高通过司法解释将在网络上编造传播虚假信息引发公共秩序混乱的行为也纳入“起哄闹事型”寻衅滋事罪规制的空间，以寻衅滋事罪来严厉制裁日趋蔓延的网络造谣行为，这在理论界引起一定的争议。基于刑法的谦抑性和客观主义的解释立场，严格界定其适用范围，保障公民的自由权利是当前的重要任务。为了更好理解本罪，文章首先对寻衅滋事罪进行了历史和比较考察。其次以法益为切入点讨论本罪的正当性问题，同时结合两高最新司法解释，对废止论和存在论的观点进行评述，提出本罪具有补充性的特征，故其存在有一定价值。然后对客观要件从行为要件、空间要件及程度要件三个角度详细论述。对在网络空间散布虚假信息寻衅滋事的行为进行了分析，对虚假信息的概念、特征及司法界定进行了详细论述。接着对公共场所的概念进行了梳理，界定了公共场所的特征。此外，结合两高最新司法解释对“网络空间是否属于公共场所”这一重要问题进行了分析。在程度要件方面，，本文着重对“严重混乱”以及“公共秩序严重混乱”展开分析，并提出自己的界定标准。最后笔者提出了“起哄闹事型”寻衅滋事罪的完善建议，认为应当避免“起哄闹事型”寻衅滋事罪的过度扩张，建构一套具有高度可操作性的立案标准体系。
[Abstract]:The crime of provoking and causing trouble stipulated in Article 293 of the Criminal Law of our country is evolved from the crime of hooliganism in the criminal law of 1979. But less attention has been paid to it. In 2013, through judicial explanations, the two High Contracting parties also included in the "hook-up" crime of provocation and disturbance the creation and dissemination of false information on the Internet, which led to public order disorder. The crime of provoking and causing trouble is used to severely sanction the spreading online disinformation, which has aroused some controversy in the theoretical circle. Based on the explanation of modesty and objectivism of the criminal law, the scope of its application is strictly defined. In order to better understand this crime, the article first makes a historical and comparative study on the crime of provoking trouble. Secondly, the legitimacy of the crime is discussed from the point of view of legal interests. At the same time, combined with the latest judicial interpretation of the two high schools, the author comments on the views of the annulment theory and the existential theory, and points out that the crime has complementary characteristics, so its existence has certain value. This paper analyzes the behavior of spreading false information in cyberspace, and analyzes the concept of false information. The characteristics and judicial definition are discussed in detail. Then the concept of public places is combed, and the characteristics of public places are defined. Combined with the latest judicial interpretation of the two high schools, this paper analyzes the important question of whether cyberspace is a public place. In the aspect of degree elements, this paper focuses on the analysis of "serious chaos" and "serious disorder of public order". Finally, the author puts forward the perfect suggestion of the crime of "hooting and causing trouble", and thinks that the excessive expansion of the crime of "hooting and causing trouble" should be avoided. Build a set of highly operable filing standards system.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.36

【参考文献】