论诈骗罪中的“处分意识”

发布时间：2018-03-23 02:31

本文选题：诈骗罪　切入点：处分意识　出处：《东方法学》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：指责处分意识不要说无法区分盗窃罪与诈骗罪,并不妥当。处分意识的必要性在于占有意思的必要性。处分意识是指处分人意识到将自己占有的财物或享有的财产性利益转移给对方占有或享有。首先,处分人需意识到自己占有财物或享有财产性利益。这种占有意思必须是具体的占有意思。其次,处分人在认识自己"转移占有"时,只需意识到财物的占有状态的改变。就有体物而言,不需要对财物的价值、数量及种类有认识;这些内容属于"错误认识"的认识内容,但不是"处分意识"的认识内容。就财产性利益而言,通过意思表示放弃债权的当场实现可能性,就表明有处分意识。"偷换二维码"案件中,如果顾客对收款账户(二维码账户)不负有审查义务,则商家是被害人,行为人构成盗窃罪,盗窃对象不是商家的财物,而是商家的财产性利益,也即商家针对顾客的债权。
[Abstract]:Don't say that consciousness cannot distinguish between punishment accused of theft and fraud, is not appropriate. The necessity of punishment that is necessity possession. Disciplinary consciousness refers to the disposition to be aware of his possession of the property or property interests have transferred to other possession or enjoy. First of all, people need to be aware of their own disposition of possession of property or enjoy the property interests. The possession must be specific possession. Secondly, in the understanding of their disposition "transfer of possession", just need to be aware of the possession of the property changes. There are objects, without the need for property value, the number and type of knowledge; these contents belong to "understand the content, but the understanding mistake" not "punishment consciousness". Property interests, by means of the possibility of realizing the creditor's right on the spot, shows the disposition of consciousness. "Steal for two-dimensional code case If a customer has no obligation to check accounts receivable (two-dimensional code account), the merchant is the victim, the actor constitutes theft, and the object of theft is not the property of the merchant, but the property interests of the merchant, that is, the merchant's claim for the customer.

【作者单位】：华东师范大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】