我国危险犯立法问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-24 03:38

本文选题：危险犯　切入点：风险社会　出处：《北方工业大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：本论文从危险犯的概念切入,探讨危险犯的行为类型、风险社会理论与风险刑法的衔接、危险犯之"危险"与风险社会之"风险"以及风险刑法之"风险"之间的关系,对刑法教义学下危险犯的基本理论进行厘清。在此基础上,运用SPSS软件,对我国刑事法律规范中的危险犯内容进行实证分析,重在发现危险犯立法数量之变化,体现在哪些领域,故意抽象危险犯、故意具体危险犯和过失具体危险犯的分布情况及比例,危险犯条文的刑罚配置;与此同时,以德国刑法为参考对象,对我国危险犯立法进行评析,发现我国危险犯立法存在的不足以及可借鉴的经验。接着对危险犯立法存在的争议进行分析,主要有刑法保护的前置与刑法谦抑性之探讨、社会防卫与自由保障之协调、刑事处罚与行政处罚之衔接。然后,对危险犯立法应当考量的因素进行探讨,主要体现在:宪法的价值指引和刑事政策之影响。对于危险犯立法应充分考察现有的基本刑事政策和具体刑事政策,将其指导性要求贯彻到刑事立法之中,但应进行限制;综合考虑这些因素之后,提出我国的危险犯立法路径选择——即动态的立法路径。最后,就我国危险犯立法完善提出建议。应在环境犯罪领域、经济犯罪领域、个人法益领域对危险犯进行立法上的修改和完善,具体修改主要集中在法条的内容、结构设置和刑法配置等方面。
[Abstract]:From the concept of dangerous crime, this paper discusses the behavior type of dangerous crime, the connection between risk society theory and risk criminal law, the relationship between "risk" of dangerous crime and "risk" of risk society, and "risk" of risk criminal law. This paper clarifies the basic theory of dangerous crime under the doctrine of criminal law. On this basis, by using SPSS software, this paper makes an empirical analysis of the content of dangerous crime in the criminal law norm of our country, and focuses on finding the change of the number of dangerous crime legislation. In what fields, the distribution and proportion of intentional abstract dangerous crime, intentional specific dangerous crime and negligent specific dangerous crime, and the penalty allocation of the articles on dangerous crime; at the same time, taking German criminal law as the reference object, This paper analyzes the legislation of dangerous crime in our country, and finds out the deficiency of the legislation of dangerous crime in our country and the experience that can be used for reference. Then, the author analyzes the disputes existing in the legislation of dangerous crime, mainly discusses the preposition of criminal law protection and the modesty of criminal law. The coordination between social defense and freedom protection, the connection between criminal punishment and administrative punishment. Then, the factors that should be considered in the legislation of dangerous crime are discussed. It is mainly reflected in: the value guide of constitution and the influence of criminal policy. The existing basic criminal policy and specific criminal policy should be fully examined, and the guiding requirements should be carried out into the criminal legislation, but should be restricted; After considering these factors synthetically, this paper puts forward the choice of legislation path of dangerous crime in our country-that is, the dynamic legislative path. Finally, it puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of the legislation of dangerous crime in our country, which should be in the field of environmental crime and economic crime. In the field of personal legal interest, the legislation of dangerous crime is amended and perfected, and the specific amendments are mainly focused on the content, structure and criminal law allocation of the law.
【学位授予单位】：北方工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】