贿赂犯罪证明标准问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-27 10:35

本文选题：贿赂　切入点：贪污　出处：《太原科技大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：对贿赂犯罪行使侦查权，是《刑事诉讼法》赋予检察机关的一项职权，依法行使侦查权是法律对检察机关提出的要求。检察机关对贿赂犯罪的侦查过程是收集证据、还原历史真相的过程，由于收集的证据具有事后性的特点，故存在法律真实与客观真实之间的差异，检察机关收集证据的形式目的就是要将这种差异缩小到忽略不计的程度。要达到这一程度，于是就有了证明标准这样的概念。贿赂犯罪的证明标准在法律中并无明确的表述，法律只有普通刑事犯罪证明标准的表达，，然而贿赂犯罪既不同于贪污犯罪和挪用犯罪，更不同于普通刑事犯罪，其本身具有一定特殊性，这就决定了贿赂犯罪所须要收集的证据也具有特殊性，而对于证据的证明标准而言也应当具有自身的特点。正是由于贿赂犯罪的证明标准的特殊属性，因而无论是对于证明标准体系的构成、目的价值和形式价值的实现亦或者是证明标准差异化的平衡等，都能够起到积极的促进作用，是检察机关办理贿赂犯罪案件时不可忽视的。然而，检察机关长期的司法实践中暴露出当前我国贿赂犯罪证明标准存在着诸多不足，主要体现在法定客观标准过于抽象不具体、证明标准单一层次性不足、量刑情节证明标准层次性不鲜明、配套实施制度不健全等几个方面。本文针对贿赂犯罪证明标准的这些不足，结合其在实践中发挥的作用提出了完善贿赂犯罪构成的证明标准、划分贿赂犯罪证明标准层次、明确贿赂犯罪量刑情节证明标准、规范配套措施等意见和建议。
[Abstract]:The exercise of investigation power on bribery crime is a power entrusted to the procuratorial organ by the Criminal procedure Law, and the exercise of investigation power according to law is the request of the procuratorial organ by law. The investigation process of the bribery crime by the procuratorial organ is to collect evidence. In the process of restoring historical truth, there is a difference between legal truth and objective truth because the collected evidence has the characteristics of hindsight. The purpose of the procuratorial organ in collecting evidence is to narrow the difference to the point of neglect. To achieve this point, the concept of standard of proof comes into being. The standard of proof of bribery crime is not clearly expressed in the law. The law only expresses the standard of proof of ordinary criminal crime. However, bribery crime is different from both embezzlement and embezzlement crimes, but also different from ordinary criminal offences. It has its own particularity, which determines that the evidence to be collected by the bribery crime has its own characteristics, and the proof standard of the evidence should also have its own characteristics, which is precisely due to the special nature of the proof standard of the bribery crime. Therefore, it can play a positive role in promoting the constitution of the standard system of proof, the realization of the objective value and the formal value, or the balance of the difference of the standard of proof. Is when procuratorial organ handles bribery crime case cannot be ignored. However, in the long judicial practice of procuratorial organs, there are many shortcomings in the current standard of proof of bribery in our country, which are mainly reflected in the fact that the legal objective standard is too abstract and unspecific, and the standard of proof is not sufficient in the single level. The level of proof standard of sentencing circumstances is not clear, the supporting implementation system is not perfect and so on. In view of these shortcomings of the standard of proof of bribery crime, this paper puts forward the proof standard of perfecting the constitution of bribery crime according to the function it plays in practice. This paper divides the level of proof standard of bribery crime, clarifies the proof standard of sentencing circumstances of bribery crime, and standardizes the supporting measures and so on.
【学位授予单位】：太原科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.23;D924.392

【参考文献】