象征性立法对刑法功能的损害——二十年来中国刑事立法总评

发布时间：2018-03-30 06:23

  本文选题：风险犯罪　切入点：安全　出处：《政治与法律》2017年03期

【摘要】：受全球化风险社会影响,我国二十年来刑事立法为了应对日益突发的各类风险,也进行了一定数量的象征性立法。为了回应国民的"体感治安",民众的安心感成为晚近以来恐怖犯罪、网络犯罪、环境犯罪等新型风险犯罪的立法理由。象征性立法因过多地服务于安全目的而损害了刑法的法益保护功能,因谦抑不足而损害了刑法的人权保障功能,因执行不足而损害了刑法的实用主义功能。在风险抗制与刑事治理的紧张关系之中,宜尽量恪守自由刑法的法治特质;刑法相对于其他法的关系应处于"被动式"地位,在站位问题上,属于最后序列。
[Abstract]:Influenced by the risk society of globalization, in the past 20 years, in order to cope with various kinds of risks, A certain number of symbolic legislation has also been made. In order to respond to the "sense of security" of the people, the people's sense of peace has become a terrorist crime and a cybercrime in the recent past. Symbolic legislation damages the legal interest protection function of the criminal law because it serves too much security purposes, and damages the human rights protection function of the criminal law because of modesty and insufficiency. The lack of enforcement damages the pragmatism function of criminal law. In the tense relationship between risk resistance and criminal governance, it is advisable to abide by the legal characteristics of free criminal law as far as possible, and the relationship between criminal law and other laws should be in a "passive" position. In the problem of station, belong to the final sequence.
【作者单位】： 东南大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924
，

本文编号：1684712